The advertising above is just a source of revenue, and sometimes, I don't know what will appear there.
Unique grips and accessories for your 1911!
Relocating to Boise? Use my realtor, neighbor, and friend, Cindy Smith csmith@1realtyone.com.
Magazines for cheap!
PayPal members: to make a contribution
Email me at blogmail at claytoncramer dot com. Sorry to be so indirect, but all spambots must die! But they haven't died yet! Include the word spamIamnot in your subject line to make sure that my spam blocker lets you through.
Labels: abortion Labels: telescopes Labels: gun rights Labels: intelligent design Labels: intelligent design
Never forget!
I ran for Idaho state senate in 2008--didn't win
I've written a number of history books, as well as scholarly and popular articles, (see my web page).
Sorry, high pressure isn't included.
My nephew Shippy makes very pretty ceramic items. Click here to visit his online studio. Give someone one of these, and you can be sure that they don't already have one!
Click here to find out why the Amazon.com Honor System paybox is no longer here.
RSS feed
Other blogs you may enjoy:
My civilian gun defense use blog
My daughter's blog
Pete Drum's Web Page
Gun Laws Don't Work
instapundit.com
Dissecting Leftism -- By John Ray
A courageous Briton arguing for relaxing Britain's gun control laws
Right Thoughts
Final Protective Fire
Amitai Etzioni's Blog
Scrappleface -- Dangerously Clever Satire
Michael Williams -- Master of None
Another Conservative Blogger
A Group Blog By Iraqis
THE MESOPOTAMIAN: TO BRING ONE MORE IRAQI VOICE OF THE SILENT MAJORITY TO THE ATTENTION OF THE WORLD
Specializing in discussions of discrimination and affirmative action
An Iraqi dentist
Promoting children being raised by their own parents
A federal law clerk opines about the law
Michelle Malkin's blog
Impearls: a blog as electic and interesting as mine
Proving that the United States military does more than kill people and break things.
May not agree with this group on everything, but stopping the ACLU is high on my list
A conservative/moderate black blogger.
Another sensible American
Sex, Crime, and Corruption in the Democratic Party
Music, Politics, Motorcycles
Maggie's Farm: Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
A blog dedicated to "Documenting Saddam Hussein's support of Terrorism"
The blog of one of my fellow bloggers on the Civilian Gun Self-Defense Blog
J. Norman Heath's Blog--a circus rigger and Second Amendment scholar (really!)
Buckeye Firearms Association, for you Ohio gun owners and activists
Click here for a FREE NEWSLETTER on Ohio Gun Rights from Buckeye Firearms Association!
Another conservative.
Neocon Blues
Conservative Oasis
Other Idaho Bloggers
Bubbleheads is a retired submariner
An Idaho State University student. A Democrat. Someday, she'll start paying income taxes and change.
A retired Las Vegas stagehand, of all things.
archives
Search only this site: Click here and enter your search string at the beginning of the search field.
Does Anyone Remember The Murder of "Kitty" Genovese?
Reading a news story like this brings it back: CORONA, Calif. — Two men were caught on a mall's security camera as they chased a woman through a parking structure, then grabbed and stuffed her into the trunk of a car.
I suppose it is no coincidence that the New York City murder of "Kitty" Genovese in front of 38 witnesses, and a kidnapping in which bystanders took no steps to stop this crime, both took place in places with very restrictive gun control laws. I can't really blame the bystanders; step into a situation like that, and there's a good chance that the bad guys will shoot or stab you. (For some odd reason, people prepared to commit felonies like kidnapping don't pay much attention to laws about concealed carry of guns and knives.)
Nearby shoppers seemed to notice the apparent abduction, but none attempted to stop it.
Police on Thursday were still trying to determine the identities of the woman, believed to be in her 20s, and two men involved in the Sunday evening incident at the Corona Discount Mall.
The woman's videotaped reaction upon seeing the men suggested she knew them. [emphasis added]
More Wicked Satire at Scrappleface About Arafat
Read it all: (2004-11-12) -- U.S. President George Bush today praised Palestinian leader Yassir Arafat for "assuming a new attitude," according to a White House spokesman.
...
U.S. negotiators reportedly expect the Palestinian leader to put up less resistance to reasonable proposals, thanks to "a new posture that is more grounded, stable, consistent."
Five Months Working Out at the Gym
I haven't lost any appreciable weight--but looking at a team picture from last year, I am noticeably thinner. When I gave blood today, they took my blood pressure--and it was 108/80. According to this web site, a normal blood pressure for an adult is 120/80. Since I am still carrying about 35 pounds more than I should (according to this table), I guess that's a pretty good sign of my cardiovascular fitness.
Madonna's New Book
This news article about Madonna's new children's book contains an illuminating observation: "Lotsa de Casha" (search) will be released next summer, the singer's publisher, Nicholas Callaway, said Wednesday.
Shouldn't the greyhound only have one name? Well, okay, Maddona's full name is Madonna Louise Veronica Ciccone, but everyone knows her as Madonna; the greyhound should be named Lotsa.
"All the characters in the book will be animals, and Lotsa de Casha is an Italian greyhound who has all the money in the world but no happiness," said Callaway. "He thinks only of himself."
If Madonna's obscene wealth, much of it made from music videos that she would not want her kids to see, isn't making her happy, she could give most of it away. (I'll be glad to help her find places to give it.)
Speaking Ill of the Dead
I generally avoid speaking ill of the dead, but let's not forget that Arafat was a terrorist. There are some legitimate complaints that the Palestinians had, but Arafat's methods of getting "attention" involved murdering civilians, hijacking airliners, and then blowing them up. See here for a discussion of the absurdity of the nice things that everyone is saying about him now.
How To Waste $73 Million
From a New York Post Deborah Orin column about why the Democrats lost: Democrats also outsourced a big chunk of their vote and ad operations to groups funded by Soros & Co.
I don't know if the number is accurate, but it is a good reminder that Democrats use the same approach in elections that they use in government--just throw money at it, and maybe it will go away.
In all, Soros and four other top Dem fat cats anted up an amazing record $73.9 million to elect Kerry via a campaign-law loophole.
The problem for Dems: that loophole is likely to get slammed shut well before the 2008 race.
That would be a special problem for Democrats, since they got three times as much money as Republicans through that loophole, which allowed creation of supposedly independent groups known as "527s."
Nice To Hear This
One of the friends living in Blue State America who asked me to explain the dark force that took over America on Election Day (since he wasn't going to hear it from anyone there): Right now my lefty friends are so hysterical I can't even converse with them. Thank you for being gracious in victory; and thanks for sharing your insights.
I'm blogging this just for those of you who watch my blog because you consider me a dangerous lunatic.
Clayton, you are an oasis of reason in the current storm of mindlessly passionate ideology. I don't always agree with your conclusions, but I always respect your methods. I think that if the whole country could share in the kind of discourse that we have, there would be no more Kent States or Ruby Ridges or Wacos.
And that's what I want.
What If Roe v. Wade (1973) Were Overturned?
Blackstone's Commentaries of the Laws of England argues that one of the rights of Englishmen included "the right to life"--but in a considerably more restricted form than would not make the most extreme pro-lifers happy: Life is the immediate gift of God, a right inherent by nature in every individual; and it begins in contemplation of law as soon as an infant is able to stir in the mother’s womb. For if a woman is quick with child, and by a potion, or otherwise killeth it in her womb; or if any one beat her, whereby the child dieth in her body, and she is delivered of a dead child; this, though not murder, was by the antient law homicide or manslaughter. But at present it is not looked upon in quite so atrocious a light, though it remains a very heinous misdemeanor.
An original intent argument would recognize that first trimester abortions were a right clearly protected by the Ninth Amendment from federal interference. You could also make a strong original intent argument that first trimester abortion is a right protected from the states as well under the Ninth Amendment as a right "retained by the people." It appears that the states used the common law definition of abortion (see Blackstone above) until at least 1828 (pp. 5-6) when New York adopted a more restrictive measure, and all states had done so by 1900. Still, an original intent argument would leave first trimester abortions protected from state regulation, based on the state of abortion laws in 1789.
By the time the Fourteenth Amendment was passed in 1868, at least some states were definitely prohibiting first trimester abortions, but I'm not sure that it changes anything. The Fourteenth Amendment arguments based on incorporation (selective or full) and equal protection would seem to leave the existing protection of first trimester abortion untouched. (This section is here mostly because I found it interesting, and because I found it before I found other parts that demolished the argument that I was going to draw from this.) Examples: Archives of Maryland, 142:2652 passim, which explicitly includes abortion at any stage: That any person who shall knowingly advertise, print, publish, distribute or circulate, or knowingly cause to be advertised, printed, published, distributed or circulated, any pamphlet, printed paper, book, newspaper notice, advertisement or reference containing words or language, giving or conveying any notice, hint or reference to any person, or to the name of any person real or fictitious, from whom ; or to any place, house, shop or office, when any poison, drug, mixture, preparation, medicine or noxious thing, or any instrument or means whatever ; for the purpose of producing abortion, or who shall knowingly sell, or cause to be sold any such poison, drug, mixture, preparation, medicine or noxious thing or instrument of any kind whatever ; or where any advice, direction, information or knowledge may be obtained for the purpose of causing the miscarriage or abortion of any woman pregnant with child, at any period of her pregnancy, or shall knowingly sell or cause to be sold any medicine, or who shall knowingly use or cause to be used any means whatsoever for that purpose, shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than three years, or by a fine of not less than five hundred nor more than one thousand dollars, or by both, in the discretion of the Court....
This was apparently a re-enactment of an existing abortion statute from 1867. Certainly, there is plenty of history of prosecutions for procuring abortions in Maryland, perhaps as early as 1657, where a "jury of women" examined "Elizabeth Robins": We found the Said Elizabeth in a very Sad Condition and in a Condition not like to other women, & Confessed that She had twice
The Texas abortion statute passed in 1854 that was the ancestor of the statute challenged in Roe v. Wade (1973) clearly establishes that such laws were on the books in at least two states when the Fourteen Amendment was ratified.
taken Savin; once boyled in milk and the other time Strayned through a Cloath, and at the taking thereof not Supposing her self with Child as She Sayeth, takeing it for wormes not knowing the Vertue thereof any other wayes...
So what if the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade? What would the practical effect be? Remember that when the Supreme Court made this decision, elective first trimester abortions were available in five states, four by legislative action (New York, Washington, Alaska, and Hawaii) and one by judicial activism (California). An overturning of Roe would have no impact on those five states, and it seems likely that most of the other Blue States would retain their current laws. Remember that some states, such as California, have laws that are far less restrictive on abortion that Roe allows. To see an example of a Red State with an abortion law that is just about up to the bumper stops of what Roe allows a state to do, look at Idaho Code Title 18, Chapter 6.
I suspect that even without Roe, some of the Red States would not change their current laws, simply because a complete ban on elective first trimester abortions would create too many difficult cases. Writing a statute that allowed the "popular" exceptions, such as rape, incest, severe deformities, would open up a hornet's nest of political questions. Still, let's not pretend that everything would be status quo; I have no question that at least some Red States would ban most elective first trimester abortions, ban partial-birth abortion, and probably ban second trimester abortions.
But what, realistically, does that do? It means that abortion rights activists, instead of spending money on political campaigns and legal fees, could be spending it on transportation. The cost of a bus ticket from Las Vegas to Los Angeles isn't going to be that much, or Kansas City to Chicago. The only places where transportation costs to another state will be really high are Hawaii and Alaska--and both of those already allowed elective abortions in 1970. Yes, it will be a darn nuisance for women that want an abortion to take a day or two off work or school to get an abortion, but these aren't like getting a wart removed: I would expect that most women who have an abortion are expecting to spend a day or two recovering, anyway. I would also hope--unless the pro-choice forces have been misleading us about how often abortions are really needed--that this would be a once in a lifetime event. Unlike a lot of other rights, you don't need to exercise this every day, every week, or even every month.
Now, the pro-choice forces insist that this is a right, and it should not be restricted in any manner at all. Gun rights activists have been making the same argument (and with a much stronger textual basis), and yet, we have generally accepted that as much as we might dislike the insane gun control laws of New York, California, and Massachusetts, it is better to have a patchwork of state laws, and Americans can move if they find a particular state's laws too burdensome, than to have a single federal law (or lack thereof) that fails to satisfy Californians for being too lax, and irritates Idahoans because it is far too strict.
This Went Out of Fashion More Than A Century Ago
From an upset Democrat: I would like to fight a Bush supporter to vent my anger. If you are one, have a fiery streek, please contact me so we can meet and physically fight. I would like to beat the [expletive deleted] out of you.
I'm hoping that this is parody, but I fear that it is not. Interesting headline on that web page: Straight male seeks Bush supporter for fair, physical fight - m4m
Why does his sexual orienation matter? I thought he was looking for a fight.
Color Me Green With Envy
Combining two telescopes to make binoculars has become all the rage among amateur telescope makers the last few years. The most outrageous example I have seen involved two 25" reflectors. This ad, however, may take the cake for most money spent, and best taste in equipment: The 130 f/6 is renowned as the best all around 5" scope made. Unparelleled for performance, quality and workmanship, the Astro-physics 130 f/6 has been the standard that all other brands strive to match. The f/6 is the perfect combination of fast focal length for photography and wide field views and yet still perform to unmatched high power visual observation. As most of you know, these are now out of production. I have two scopes from the same run, with the same batch of glass, same coatings, only ten serial numbers apart and are virtually identical. ... I was considering making these a phenomenal pair of binoculars, but have decided my viewing conditions just don't warrant equipment like this.
And you can have the pair for $10,800!
More Wicked Satire From Scrappleface
Concerning Senator Specter's "warning" to Bush about pro-life nominees: Sen. Arlen Specter, R/D-PA, today retracted previous remarks on judicial nominees which "may have been ill-conceived."
...
"If I could review the transcript of that AP interview, I would extract those remarks and take a pair of scissors to that portion of my statement," said Mr. Specter.
A spokesman for the president said the Bush administration is still debating the question of "when a chairmanship actually begins".
"Technically, Sen. Specter is not the chairman of the judiciary committee at this point," White House spokesman Scott McClellan said. "He has the potential, but senate Republicans still have a choice, and although he's likely to serve out his term as chairman, his colleagues may make an exception to protect the health of the Constitution."
All Michael Moore Fans Need To Explain This To Me
Michael Moore has called the Fallujah "insurgents" the moral equivalent of the Minutemen. Odd. But I don't recall reading about the Minutemen taking relatives of General Gage hostage, and threatening to kill them: BAGHDAD, Iraq — Two members of the Iraqi prime minister's family were abducted from their Baghdad home, his spokesman said Wednesday, and militants said they would be beheaded in two days if their demands are not met.
Michael Moore's defense of terorrists has gone on long enough. When will the American left repudiate this sort of behavior--and Michael Moore? Apparently never.
...
Al-Naqeeb identified the missing as the prime minister's cousin, Ghazi Allawi, and the cousin's daughter-in-law.
"Ghazi Allawi is 75 years old. He has no political affiliation, and is not holding a government post," the statement said.
A posting on an Islamic Web site by a group calling itself Ansar al-Jihad group claimed responsibility for kidnapping three Allawi relatives, and threatened to behead them in 48 hours if their demands aren't met.
Clouded Judgment
There is a legitimate argument for decriminalizing various drugs, and then there is the oversimplified form of the argument that these drugs don't cause harm to anyone but the user. But how do we explain arguments like this? Madison County Attorney Joe Smith had argued that no killer on Nebraska's death row had so many victims as Galindo and his accomplices.
The fact of the matter is that quite a number of intoxicants (including legal ones, like alcohol) do have very obvious effects on behavior, causing people to take actions that they might otherwise not have done.
Defense attorney Doug Stratton had argued that Galindo should be sentenced to five terms of life in prison, noting Galindo's cooperation with police and saying Galindo's judgment was clouded by methamphetamine and that he had faced pressure from ringleader Jose Sandoval.
There is an argument that says that the damage done by criminalization is more serious than the destruction caused by impaired judgment. This might well be true (a question of fact that needs to be proved)--but the libertarian and liberal arguments for decriminalization would be both more accurate, and less effective, if they included these complicating details.
Extraordinary Arrogance
Michael Williams describes something that is so Blue State: When I get home from work I want to go inside and relax, I don't want to collect hundreds of papers from my front porch advertising products I could easily find for myself if I had any desire for them. If I want to buy a house, sell a house, install new windows, paint my house, order pizza, order chinese food, or vote for something I certainly don't need a door flyer to empower me. Normally I just leave the crap there and throw it away the next morning when I leave for work. I don't even like checking my mail when I get home, and most of that's crap too.
This is not a way to get someone to buy your service.
So when I got home tonight it was all dark (thanks a lot, winter) and my porch was littered with the typical garbage. I waded through it to my door and tried to stick the key in, but I couldn't. What the heck? Someone had the nerve to tape their ad to my door knob over the keyhole.
Remember The Woody Allen Movie Sleeper?
Remember the "Orgasmatron" in that movie? A doctor in North Carolina using a spinal cord stimulator to help female patients with chronic back pain accidentally invented it: In a surgical procedure done in his office, Meloy implants the electrodes from this device into the back of the patient, at the bottom part of the spinal cord. When the electrodes are stimulated with a remote control, the brain interprets the signal as an orgasm, he said. The device is about the size of a pacemaker and can be turned on and off with a handheld remote control.
Meloy conducted a study of 11 women that he has submitted for publication to the Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.
"Six of them had never had an orgasm before," Meloy said. "Five of them had and then lost the ability. The results were promising in my mind. We were able to stimulate 91 percent of the women, 10 out of 11."
Marks of Fanaticism
It's when you lose the election by 3.5 million votes, even prominent Democrats admit that they lost--and you still insist that there was fraud: WASHINGTON, Nov. 9, 2004 -- There were minor voting irregularities on Election Day — long lines, voting machine breakdowns, shortages of provisional ballots — but some people are now leveling charges of voter fraud.
To their credit, ABC News is treating these conspiracy theories as nonsense, and quotes Kerry campaign officials as agreeing that there is nothing to these claims. But the Democrats have their own equivalent of the "marks on the back of road signs to tell the UN soldiers where to go" lunatics.
Doug Chapin, a nonpartisan election analyst, finds the claims to be baseless. "There were no problems that would lead me to believe that there were stolen elections or widespread fraud," he said.
"There was no overwhelming reason to cast doubt on the outcome of this election," seconded Democratic strategist Donna Brazile, the campaign manager for Al Gore's 2000 campaign. "George Bush got more votes this time."
Nevertheless, many people have devised various theories, including stories of voters in largely Democratic counties in Florida whose votes were changed for Bush, phantom voters in Ohio and exit polls showing John Kerry in the lead that were truer than the final tally. Off the record, many Democratic strategists dismiss such allegations, but they also know such resentment can be channeled for political use in the future.
One of the dangerous moments in any political movement is when the activists get so out of touch with America that they start to think that they are the majority. Pauline Kael's famous 1972 remark comes to mind: "I don't know how Richard Nixon could have won.... I don't know anybody who voted for him." The Weather Underground and similar leftist revolutionary groups of the 1970s had the same problem: they were spending too much time talking to their professors and other grad students, and not enough time talking to ordinary people, and they imagined that the masses were ready to rise up against the government, with a little encouragement.
The Scientology/IRS Lawsuit Again
I blogged a while back about the bizarre situation where one religious institution has a special (and officially secret) tax break--and it isn't one of the churches that the left hates, but one that Hollywood loves. The lawsuit challenging this--well, actually asking if other religions can get in on this benefit--has gone to court: LOS ANGELES – An Orthodox Jewish couple believe the Internal Revenue Service should allow tax deductions for their children's religious schooling, a lawyer argued during the opening of a nonjury trial.
Hey, good enough for Tom Cruise, good enough for the rest of us, right?
Michael and Marla Sklar claim that since Church of Scientology members are allowed to write off the cost of spiritual counseling sessions, they should be allowed to write off their children's Jewish school tuition.
The Sklars brought the lawsuit after the IRS ruled their deductions were invalid. The couple's attorney, Jeffrey Zuckerman, argued the First Amendment prohibits the IRS from discriminating on the basis of religion.
However, Louis B. Jack, an attorney for the IRS, said a ruling in the Sklars' favor would lead "millions of Americans to start deducting religious school tuition."
Benighted Fundamentalists Suffering Consequences of Their Ignorance
At least, I used to be told that almost every significant problem involved with sexual behavior (unwanted pregnancy, STDs, emotional damage, etc.) was caused by America's severe Puritanism that prevented us from being properly educated about sex. But this problem is in London, sophisticated post-Christian place that it is: The number of Londoners suffering sexually transmitted diseases has risen by more than a third, new figures reveal.
Oh, and here's the solution:
They show that cases of infections soared between 1997 and last year, from 169,721 cases to 228,641. The final figure could be higher as some clinics have still to submit information.
The rise has embarrassed ministers, amid calls for a highprofile, well-funded sexual health campaign. Of particular concern is the rise in chlamydia among the young - it can show no symptoms but leads to infertility in men and women if left untreated.
One in eight men and one in 10 women are thought to have chlamydia, a rate estimated to be even higher among those in their early twenties."Ministers have dithered and delayed," said the Liberal Democrat MP for Brent East. "The NHS needs to focus on prevention, not just treating symptoms. The answer has to be better education about sex within the context of relationships, and more accessible sexual health clinics."
As a reader observes, Um, what's that popular definition of insanity? Something about "doing the same thing over and over, expecting a different result"?
Post-Election Mental Problems
I had to check this article to make sure that it wasn't a parody from those fine folks at The Onion: More than a dozen traumatized John Kerry supporters have sought and received therapy from a licensed Florida psychologist since their candidate lost to President Bush, the Boca Raton News learned Monday.
Now, I know how depressing it can be when the other side wins the election. I can remember it well, in 1976, 1980, 1984, 1988, 1992, 1996. (Yes, my candidate lost in every one of those elections. I've moved markedly to the left since 1992, now voting pretty consistently Republican.) But to the point where you need therapy to avoid suicide? This is not a good sign.
Boca Raton trauma specialist Douglas Schooler said he has treated 15 clients and friends with “intense hypnotherapy” since the Democratic nominee conceded last Wednesday.
“I had one friend tell me he’s never been so depressed and angry in his life,” Schooler said. “I observed patients threatening to leave the country or staring listlessly into space. They were emotionally paralyzed, shocked and devastated.”
...
Some mental health professionals in South Florida said Monday they have already developed a new category for the Kerry-related stress reactions. Because Palm Beach County voted heavily for Kerry, the therapists said, many residents hurt themselves by so anxiously expecting the Massachusetts senator to win – especially those who maintained unrealistic recount hopes after their candidate’s concession.
“We’re calling it ‘post-election selection trauma’ and we’re working to develop a counseling program for it,” said Rob Gordon, the Boca-based executive director of the American Health Association. “It’s like post-traumatic stress syndrome, but it’s a short-term shock rather than a childhood trauma.”
Gordon, the first American Red Cross psychotherapist sent to Ground Zero after the 9/11 terror attacks, said therapists’ main concern is to prevent the recurrence of Kerry-related suicides like the one in New York City.
“There are definitely people depressed by John Kerry’s loss, and this can easily lead to suicides like the one we saw up in New York this weekend,” Gordon said. “Luckily, it can be treated if people seek help. We’re urging people to call us immediately if they feel depressed or know anyone who is seriously stressed out.”
UPDATE: This news story indicates that the man from Georgia who committed suicide at the World Trade Center was assumed to have done so because of the election, but the detailed suicide note gives no such indication.
Floating Rate Bonds
You are probably aware of TIPS (Treasury Inflation Protected Securities), which are U.S. government bonds whose capital value adjusts with inflation. I've always found the mechanism--adding to the value of the bond, rather than changing the interest rate paid--a little strange. Obviously, in an environment like we have now, where interest rates are going to be rising, you don't want a fixed-rate bond, unless it is very close to maturity; the capital value of the bond will drop as interest rates rise.
GMAC (General Motors Acceptance Corporation, which does car financing, and I think real estate as well) is just starting to offer what seems like a more sensible floating rate bond. Instead of changing the capital value of the bond, the interest rate is the three month T-bill rate plus 200 basis points. At current rates, that would be 1.75% + 2.00%, or 3.75%. These are seven year bonds, with an S&P rating of BBB-, so compared to more conventional bonds, this isn't a spectacular return--but it does make an interesting alternative to having your money in money market funds, and with the added security that even the Fed dramatically raised interest rates over the next 6-12 months, you wouldn't be at much risk on the capital value of these bonds.
Allstate is offering what I consider a much inferior floater as well. It matures in 2016, and guarantees 7.375% coupon for the first year--then the interest rate becomes 150% of the CPI change, adjusted monthly. Since the September 2004 CPI change was 0.2%, if rates stay like this, the yield would be 2.4% a year--really disappointing. I don't know who they expect is going to buy these.
I'm Not Ordinarily Keen on Incitement to Riot Laws...
But this certainly seems to cross the line, doesn't it? Detectives from the Metropolitan police's racial and violent crime taskforce have been analysing the lyrics of Sizzla, real name Miguel Collins, along with seven other dance hall artists, for several months over claims his songs incite people to kill gays and lesbians.
...
As Sizzla starts his UK tour, Peter Tatchell, from Outrage!, demanded his shows be cancelled after the weekend murder of 37-year-old David Morley near a gay nightclub in London.
Mr Tatchell criticised police for the slow speed of their inquiry into the eight artists. He said: "If a singer was inciting the murder of black or Jewish people there would be an immediate prosecution.
"Police inquiries into these singers have gone on for over a year, why is it taking so long to get action against artists who explicitly incite the murder of lesbians and gays?"
In September police stopped a gig in Manchester by another Jamaican artist, Buju Banton, amid concerns over his lyrics, which describe throwing acid over homosexuals. Mr Tatchell believes lyrics in songs such as Boom Boom, Sizzla's latest release, are serious enough to warrant a ban on his performances as well.
In Boom Boom, Sizzla says: "Queers must be killed". In another, Pump Up, he sings: "Shoot queers."
Those Brits: Not Prudish At All
Warning: An R-rated news story about at least an R-rated TV show.
A new reality series on broadcast TV: 'I'm trying to wean myself off younger men'
The gap between Europe and America seems to be widening all the time. It is beginning to remind me of science fiction stories I used to read where Earth people would find themselves having to adjust to radically different cultures on other planets.
In a new Channel 4 reality show on common sex problems, volunteer couples make love on camera while presenter Tracey Cox advises on their performance. Energy, she says, is more important than good looks
Tracey Cox is reading me a text message she received at the hairdresser's this morning: 'Hi, Tracey, I wanted to say thanks for how much you helped me. I can have now have orgasms lying on my back... life is a lot easier. Lots of love, Charlotte.' Heavens. Of course it's all in a day's work for a sex therapist. And Cox, the best-selling author of Hot Sex and Supersex and a former editor of Australian Cosmopolitan , is fantastically unshockable. The unusual thing is that TV viewers will also get the chance to watch Charlotte, 30, from Essex, refine her orgasm technique on Channel 4 in two weeks' time. Because Cox is co-presenting Channel 4's late-night advice show, Sex Inspectors, tackling common sex problems in relationships.
Charlotte is one of the reported 70 per cent of women who experience difficulty climaxing during penetrative sex. Refreshingly the show focuses on issues of vulnerability - mismatched libidos, kids ruining a couple's sex life, what happens if someone's had an affair - rather than boastful shagging. 'I'm very proud of the fact that this show is educational and informative,' says Channel 4 head of entertainment, Julian Bellamy, 'It's not about titillation. I defy anyone to be turned on.'
But there's no getting away from the fact we get to watch couples having sex live on camera. A CCTV camera in the bedroom allows Cox and co-presenter, Michael Alvear, to assess their performance, then offer all manner of tips, toys and advice. 'Even I, who talk about sex for a living, found it rather extraordinary sitting there and watching real people have sex,' Cox admits. 'Usually when I do TV, I'm in this zen space. I offer advice, then the couples go away and try it out. So the first time I watched the footage, I went, "Oh my God."
I Want To Put Up These Signs At The Borders...
Welcome to Red States America. Don't demand that we recognize your "marriage", and we won't ask if you really want just one bed at the Motel 6.
Welcome to Red States America. You don't want to come to church Sunday morning? Fine. We don't want to pay anyone that thinks a crucifix in urine is fine art.
Welcome to Red States America. We don't have much gun control here. We don't really need it.
Welcome to Red States America. Main Street is not a clothing optional zone.
Welcome to Red States America. Utah gave up polygamy in 1890. Don't you be giving them any ideas.
Taking Off the Straitjacket
I am so pleased to see that narrow-minded sorts are taking the restraints off their history teachers, allowing a broader range of perspectives to be taught: GRANTSBURG, Wisconsin (AP) -- School officials have revised the history curriculum to allow the teaching of revisionist perspectives on American foreign policy, prompting an outcry from more than 300 elected officials who urged that the decision be reversed.
Finally! The reactionary sorts are getting their comeuppance!
Members of Grantsburg's school board believed that a state law governing the teaching of history was too restrictive. The history curriculum "should not be totally inclusive of just one historical theory," said Joni Burgin, superintendent of the district of 1,000 students in northwest Wisconsin.
Last month, when the board examined its history curriculum, language was added calling for "various models/theories" of historical motivation to be incorporated.
The decision provoked more than 300 elected officials to write a letter last week urging the Grantsburg board to reverse the policy. It follows a letter sent previously by 43 members of the Wisconsin legislature.
Oh whoops! Some mischievous person changed a few words in that news story. I'm sorry. Here's the correct version: GRANTSBURG, Wisconsin (AP) -- School officials have revised the science curriculum to allow the teaching of creationism, prompting an outcry from more than 300 educators who urged that the decision be reversed.
Hmmm. Suddenly, taking off the straightjacket that prevents teachers from examining "diverse perspectives" is a bad thing, isn't it?
Members of Grantsburg's school board believed that a state law governing the teaching of evolution was too restrictive. The science curriculum "should not be totally inclusive of just one scientific theory," said Joni Burgin, superintendent of the district of 1,000 students in northwest Wisconsin.
Last month, when the board examined its science curriculum, language was added calling for "various models/theories" of origin to be incorporated.
The decision provoked more than 300 biology and religious studies faculty members to write a letter last week urging the Grantsburg board to reverse the policy. It follows a letter sent previously by 43 deans at Wisconsin public universities.
Now, I'm sure that some of you are going to point out that unlike history, where there is really is no objective truth, biology is quite different. Well, there is objective truth in biology--and in about the same way as there is in history. There are certain facts that are clearly true.
FACT: Most animals have blood using hemoglobin, which shares the essential porphyrin ring of chlorophyll (but chlorophyll has a magnesium ion in the middle of the ring, not an iron ion).
FACT: The Republican Party pushed for the abolition of slavery after the Civil War.
The interpretations that you bring to these facts, of course, will be controversial, at least to some people.
The evolutionist would say that the shared porphyrin ring is because of a common ancestry, or perhaps that this particular structure is so well-suited to the processes of distributing oxygen and dividing carbon dioxide back to oxygen and carbon, that random processes caused the same structure to be used in both cases. This is certainly a plausible explanation, if you buy the idea that this could have happened at random. The creationist would insist that God liked the design so much, that he re-used it. This is certainly a plausible explanation, if you buy the idea that there is a God who created life. Trying to prove that either is certainly correct is going to be rather difficult!
The Republican Party's involvement in the abolition of slavery is also subject to differing controversial interpretations. Some would argue that Republican interest in abolishing slavery was because a significant faction of the party, the abolitionists, had done an effective job of appealing to the moral revulsion of Americans about slavery. A Marxian interpretation might argue that Republican opposition to slavery was because it was interfering with capitalist development of the South, preventing capitalists from fully exploiting the black workforce. Trying to "prove" either of these theories clearly right or wrong is going to be somewhat difficult.
Just as we would be appropriately indignant at a school district that prohibited the teaching of evolution, we should be appropriately indignant at a school district that refuses to allow any other models to be discussed, considered, or taught.
My guess is that any biology teacher that gave a fair presentation of the evidence for evolution vs. other models would persuade the students that evolution is clearly the most appropriate scientific model to use--but I would also expect that the less than overwhelming proof of the evolutionary model would be obvious to most of the students. Discussion of why some students cling to the theistic models could, depending on the students and the teacher, lead to some useful and illuminating discussions of how Darwin's idea were misused, producing really monstrous results.
A little humility goes a long ways--and putting a white lab coat doesn't reduce the need for it.
The Election Is Not Worth Killing Yourself Over
It's a bit depressing being on the losing side of an election (been there, done that, most of my life) but this is quite sad and irrational: New York, NY, Nov. 8 (UPI) -- Families of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks responded with shock after a Georgia man killed himself at Ground Zero over President Bush's re-election.
Remember: if you kill yourself, you can't vote in the next election. (In Chicago, however, someone else may vote for you.)
Dropping Oil Prices
I've mentioned before my suspicion that George Soros may have intentionally manipulated oil prices to throw the election to Kerry--in particular, because Soros's Quantum Fund has a history of damaging national economies to satisfy Soros's greed, and Quantum Fund used to be a player in oil futures. Now I see this news report about dropping oil prices with an interesting statement: NEW YORK (Reuters) - Oil prices dropped further from record highs on Monday, as easing concern about winter supplies prompted big-money hedge funds to switch money away from oil and into other financial markets.
Gee, which hedge funds? It would be very interesting to see if one of those hedge funds--say, Quantum Fund--was out ahead of the rest, wouldn't it?
...
As confidence grows over supplies for the northern winter, speculative hedge funds cut their net long positions in New York crude oil futures to the lowest levels in a year, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission said on Friday.
Heavy fund buying has helped drive oil's rally this year, as poor returns on equity markets and big falls in the dollar's value drew speculators to look for profits in commodities markets instead.
Shocking Discovery: Professors Lie!
A professor encourages lying: Marching order #1, therefore, is this: No matter whom you talk to outside our circles, begin to perpetuate the (false, exaggerated) notion that George Bush's victory was built not merely on values issues, but gay marriage specifically. If you feel a need to broaden it slightly, try depicting the GOP as a majority party synonymous with gay-haters, warmongers and country-clubbers.
Professor Volokh is shocked--and apparently not in the "I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!" sense--to discover a professor intentionally spreading lies: A public call urging people to consciously, deliberately spread falsehood; and it turns out that the author is Tom Schaller, "associate professor of political science at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County," who has written for "the Baltimore Sun, Boston Globe, Los Angeles Times, Washington Post and Salon."
Professor Volokh's naivete on this (and a number of other issues) has always been a little perplexing to me--but this really makes me scratch my head. The Bellesiles scandal--and the many others that have popped up over at the last few years--are reminders that professors are definitely human, with some willing to lie for political or professional advantage. Does Professor Volokh think that the professional training of an academic takes away the human propensity towards sin?
Is it just me, or is there something especially troublesome in such a statement -- not just something you think is an error or even a lie, but an explicit call urging people to spread what the author expressly acknowledges is falsehood and exaggeration -- coming from an academic and a commentator for various leading newspapers?
Both professions, it seems to me, are supposed to be committed to the pursuit and dissemination of truth. Both academics and writers for newspapers can of course express opinions, or choose what truth to spread and what falsehood to expose based on their politics. But I would have thought that for both deliberately spreading falsehoods, and deliberately urging others to deliberately spread falsehoods, would be beyond the pale, not just in their professional work but also in their outside work (which naturally reflects on their professional temperament and credibility).
No Atheists in Foxholes
Oddly enough, this comes from a French news service: With US forces massing outside Fallujah, 35 marines swayed to Christian rock music and asked Jesus Christ to protect them in what could be the biggest battle since American troops invaded Iraq last year.
Men with buzzcuts and clad in their camouflage waved their hands in the air, M-16 assault rifles laying beside them, and chanted heavy metal-flavoured lyrics in praise of Christ late Friday in a yellow-brick chapel.
...
The US military, with many soldiers coming from the conservative American south and midwest, has deep Christian roots.
In times that fighting looms, many soldiers draw on their evangelical or born-again heritage to help them face the battle.
"It's always comforting. Church attendance is always up before the big push," said First Sergeant Miles Thatford.
"Sometimes, all you've got is God."
...
Their chaplain, named Horne, told the worshippers they were stationed outside Fallujah to bring the Iraqis "freedom from oppression, rape, torture and murder ... We ask you God to bless us in that effort."
...
The crowd then followed him outside their small auditorium for a baptism of about a half-dozen marines who had just found Christ.
The young men lined up and at least three of them stripped down to their shorts.
The three laid down in a rubber dinghy filled with water and the chaplain's assistant, Navy corpsman Richard Vaughn, plunged their heads beneath the surface.
Smiling, Vaughn baptised them "in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit."
Dripping wet, Corporal Keith Arguelles beamed after his baptism.
"I just wanted to make sure I did this before I headed into the fight," he said on the military base not far from the city of Fallujah.
What Does "Reality-Based Community" Mean?
You aren't really cool on the left unless you pretend to be part of a "reality-based community." Over at Classical Values, Eric Scheie has an amusing description of what this latest piece of nonsense means to the left: Regular readers know how much I loathe labels, slogans and code-language. Perfectly good words are borrowed by various sorts of ideologues (left and right), with the result being that it's tougher and tougher to use once-ordinary words. "Family" is a perfect example which I have discussed before. A couple of years ago, some people started using the word "bright." "Choice" is another one. (Don't get me started on the word "values......") When this happens, my only resort is to tear out my hair (which is thinning, so I'd rather not), or complain to anyone who'll listen.
Some of the comments from readers are even more amusing:
The latest example of this phraseology ("REALITY BASED COMMUNITY") abounds in leftish circles of the blogosphere, and it involves the use of the word "reality" to denote opposition to Bush, opposition to the war in Iraq, and opposition to religious influences on policy making.
...
The word "reality" is invoked in a way suggesting that those who use it have a monoply on truth, and it reminds me of the way the word "bright" was used (although the latter never quite got off the ground). It strikes me as a bit arrogant to suggest that anyone who supports the war is out of touch with reality, and the term almost seems designed to mock the "red state" people for simplemindedness.
It's understandable that the "reality based community" is upset over the reelection of a man they consider hopelessly out of touch with reality -- by people they believe to be out of touch with reality. But I don't see how it advances dialogue to apply the label of "reality" to one's own view of the world. My sister considers herself to be in the "Reality Based Community." I consider her delusional. I present as evidence the following exchange. My sister has refered to Bush as Hitler. In a series of e-mails I patiently explained that Bush couldn't be Hitler since Hitler was dead. He also couldn't be a "new Hitler" since the two men have policies almost diametrically opposed. Most significantly, Bush is attempting to replace genocidal dictatorships with secular democracies. Hitler did everything he could do to destroy democracies and replace them with genocidal dictators. I thought my sister might understand the difference. I also pointed out that Hitler was a starving artist who joined the National Socialist Party, supported gun control, abortion, government control of corporations, was an athiest with an affinity for paganism, hated Jews and allied himself with radical Muslims. I then noted that the Democratic Party, not the Republicans, had a platform which came closest to Hitler's. In other words, using objective reality, not delustional rantings, Hitler is closer politically to the Democrats than to Bush.
And this one: As above commenters note, the term is used by Suskind and other secularists to slander Christians, who are seen as believing in the Iraq invasion, not because it makes sense, but because they think God wants us to invade Iraq. A more un-real view of conservative Christians would be hard to formulate. It is more of the in-your-face hypocrisy of the left, like lying that Bush lied.
The blue state bubble heads will do anything to keep from comprehending what red state America gets right. That would be giving in to the "enemy." So they look for excuses to dismiss whatever anyone else has to say. Their unreality is officially "reality," so nothing else matters. Thus Christianity, which believes in liberty as the necessary condition for moral progress, and which gave birth to America's political liberty, is equated by the "reality based" secularists with the Taliban. Eyes squeezed tight shut, they are pure partisan thinkers, impervious to all reason and evidence that seems to militate against their presumptions. Perfectly unreal.
Bush Considering Former Black Panther For The Chief Justice Seat
Yes, really. And he's considering one of those gun nuts who thinks the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. So how many seats is going to fill? Just one. He's considering Clarence Thomas for the Chief Justice position.
Colonial Bread Prices and Relative Wages
I am preparing an article on the price of guns in Colonial America, and I find myself quite amazed at how much cheaper guns are today. The average value of a gun in Colonial America varies from around 13 shillings to as much as one pound, 16 shillings (depending on colony, year, and whether this is from probate inventories or purchase records). These are equivalent to four to eighteen days wages for skilled laborers (typically earning three shillings a day). This suggests that guns were relatively expensive compared to today. (Take a look at what the average skilled worker in America grosses, then multiply by four to eighteen--there will be few used guns--and few new ones--that you can't buy for that.)
But when I start comparing the price of guns to bread back then, I get some very interesting results. I found a transaction involving a ship leaving Boston 1649 that bought 4200 1/4 pound loaves of bread, for £42, 5s. This calculates down to ten pence per pound of bread. That means that a skilled worker would have worked 1/4 of a day to buy a pound of bread--or half the day to buy a modern two pound loaf. It would appear that bread is far less expensive today than it was back then.
Intelligent Design
I am impressed how many of my readers worked all the way through my recent very long blog entry in order to politely and intelligently dispute my remarks about intelligent design theory. (Of course, since these are my readers, they are polite and intelligent.) Let me make a couple of points about this:
1. I have read some of the criticisms of Behe's intelligent design argument concerning organelles, and I have found them unpersuasive (although they are at least headed down a road that could become persuasive, with enough evidence).
2. As I pointed out some months back: I have had a very interesting exchange with a reader about this subject. If the advocates of the intelligent design argument are correct (that certain basic components of life do not appear to be the result of random processes, but show "intelligent design"), is this science? My answer is a qualified no.
Intelligent design theory advocates have something of an unfair advantage; all they have to do is demonstrate that one aspect of life suggests a designer. We would still teach evolution in biology classes as a way to make predictions (because the vast majority of biological change would still be unintelligent), but it would impose some humility on how we teach biology.
...
Evolution, whether right or wrong, is a predictive tool. It lets us make some informed guesses about what will happen--although it seems unlikely that any major changes that it can predict will happen within the lifetime of our civilization. Intelligent design, even if it turned out to be true, is not a predictive tool. If living organisms are actually indicative of intelligent design, we can't predict what that intelligence is going to do, can we? In that sense, intelligent design isn't really science in the same sense that chemistry is.
However: intelligent design arguments, to the extent that they raise serious questions about the blind and random process claims of evolution, are a legitimate restraining force on the dogmatism that characterizes biology teaching in primary and secondary education (and to some extent, even at the college level). If there are biological structures that do not seem to fit the blind and random development model of evolution, this is important, and worth discussing.
One of my readers tells me: Well, I am from the era when they were "certain". The newer speculation(s)about the mechanism (punctuated equilibrium for instance) had not been proposed yet. I went to school in the Houston Independent School District in the '60's and our proximity to NASA made our classes very thorough in all math and science subjects.
It's a troubling problem, because the reaction to Revealed Truth evolution has been either Young Earth Creationism, or nothing at all. My wife taught at a fundamentalist Christian middle school in California--where, if the textbook had been the entire basis for teaching biology, she wouldn't have bothered. It was full of insulting and often inaccurate portrayals of Darwinian evolution. What she and I did to handle this was to get students started on a discussion of the purpose of science. Our goal was for the students to understand evolutionary theory (because they were certainly going to need to understand it when they went to college), and also to understand that a theory may be a useful predictive model, without necessarily being 100% correct.
Today, on the other hand, the subject is completely avoided because of the controversy surrounding it. My own children reported they got no instruction about this at all. Of course, we live in rural East Texas now.
As a chemistry professor of mine at USC suddenly and inexplicably pointed out during a lecture about electron clouds: "We really have no idea what's going on at the subatomic level. There could be angels dancing on the heads of pins, for all we know. But it's a model that works for predicting what's going to happen, and that's all that science really is: a method of predicting things." Unfortunately, there are people out there for whom science is Truth with a capital T--and they are as troubled by teaching evolution as a predictive model, as Young Earth Creationists are by the prospect that our planet is more than 10,000 years old.
Be Careful The Analogies You Draw
Professor Lindgren points out that the liberals who are imagining that they are getting ready to refight the Scopes trial of 1925--in the words of David Brooks: It's ridiculous to say, as some liberals have this week, that we are perpetually refighting the Scopes trial, with the metro forces of enlightenment and reason arrayed against the retro forces of dogma and reaction.
have it wrong. Lindgren quotes from the textbook that Scopes was teaching from--and some of it is so offensive that no liberal would even allow it in a classroom today, much less allow a teacher to use it as a textbook: The Races of Man. — At the present time there exist upon the earth five races or varieties of man, each very different from the other in instincts, social customs, and, to an extent, in structure. These are the Ethiopian or negro type, originating in Africa; the Malay or brown race, from the islands of the Pacific; The American Indian; the Mongolian or yellow race, including the natives of China, Japan, and the Eskimos; and finally, the highest type of all, the caucasians, represented by the civilized white inhabitants of Europe and America.
Now, Lindgren makes the observation that
...
Improvement of Man. — If the stock of domesticated animals can be improved, it is not unfair to ask if the health and vigor of the future generations of men and women on the earth might not be improved by applying to them the laws of selection. This improvement of the future race has a number of factors in which we as individuals may play a part. These are personal hygiene, selection of healthy mates, and the betterment of the environment. Here 1920s science was right about the basics of evolution, but was wrong about social Darwinism and white genetic supremacy and was immoral to advocate eugenics.
I am always amazed at the strange and often racist role that evolutionary theory has played in Western civilization. From my book Black Demographic Data, 1790-1860: A Sourcebook p. 36: Reginald Horsman’s Race and Manifest Destiny: The Origins of American Racial Anglo-Saxonism describes how Enlightenment notions of the essential equality of mankind declined between 1800 and 1850. Where the Enlightenment had seen national differences as historical accidents of relatively minor importance, Romanticism glorified nationalism and localism; Enlightenment rationalism gave way to Romantic glorification of emotion. [Reginald Horsman, Race and Manifest Destiny: The Origins of American Racial Anglo-Saxonism (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981), 158.] These changes in European belief merged with the American need for an ideology to justify slavery, the removal of the Indians, and the Mexican War. The emerging “science” of phrenology (i.e., determining personality and intellectual capacity by measuring the shape of the skull) also encouraged this belief in racial difference.
Creationists often attack Darwinian evolution for promoting Social Darwinism, and its activist offspring, eugenics and the Holocaust. If evolution is true, it does not matter if it gives birth to ugly and evil theories. But it is a bit amusing to consider the same crowd that argues that truth is a social construct reflecting the dominant class's race, economic interest, and ethnicity defending evolutionary thought, with the really dark results that it has sometimes produced.
Devout Christians, as well as many proponents of white racial superiority, perceived this theory of white superiority as being at odds with the predominant Creationist viewpoint. For the most part, Creationists denied the possibility of separate races because the Old Testament book of Genesis had no description of separate Creation, and not enough time had elapsed since Adam and Eve for the development of differing races. Proponents of white racial superiority either dodged the Creationist issue or actively used the “facts” of racial difference to attack Creationist perspectives. [Horsman, passim. William Stanton, The Leopard’s Spots: Scientific Attitudes Toward Race in America 1815-59 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960), provides an even more detailed study of this subject—and with a wit that is sorely lacking in most scholarly works.]
The experience of my wife and I going through California primary and secondary schools was that teachers often taught evolution in a dogmatic manner, as a Revealed Truth. Even today, there are some serious questions from serious scientists, such as Biochemistry Professor Michael Behe, that simply do not get taken seriously in how evolution is taught. Confronting some of these questions would not only get away from this Revealed Truth approach to teaching biology, it would also bring a little humility into this subject--a recognition that there remain some significant and important questions about the mechanisms of evolution.
