The advertising above is just a source of revenue, and sometimes, I don't know what will appear there.
Unique grips and accessories for your 1911!
Relocating to Boise? Use my realtor, neighbor, and friend, Cindy Smith csmith@1realtyone.com.
Magazines for cheap!
PayPal members: to make a contribution
Email me at blogmail at claytoncramer dot com. Sorry to be so indirect, but all spambots must die! But they haven't died yet! Include the word spamIamnot in your subject line to make sure that my spam blocker lets you through.
Labels: telescopes Labels: child sexual abuse
Never forget!
I ran for Idaho state senate in 2008--didn't win
I've written a number of history books, as well as scholarly and popular articles, (see my web page).
Sorry, high pressure isn't included.
My nephew Shippy makes very pretty ceramic items. Click here to visit his online studio. Give someone one of these, and you can be sure that they don't already have one!
Click here to find out why the Amazon.com Honor System paybox is no longer here.
RSS feed
Other blogs you may enjoy:
My civilian gun defense use blog
My daughter's blog
Pete Drum's Web Page
Gun Laws Don't Work
instapundit.com
Dissecting Leftism -- By John Ray
A courageous Briton arguing for relaxing Britain's gun control laws
Right Thoughts
Final Protective Fire
Amitai Etzioni's Blog
Scrappleface -- Dangerously Clever Satire
Michael Williams -- Master of None
Another Conservative Blogger
A Group Blog By Iraqis
THE MESOPOTAMIAN: TO BRING ONE MORE IRAQI VOICE OF THE SILENT MAJORITY TO THE ATTENTION OF THE WORLD
Specializing in discussions of discrimination and affirmative action
An Iraqi dentist
Promoting children being raised by their own parents
A federal law clerk opines about the law
Michelle Malkin's blog
Impearls: a blog as electic and interesting as mine
Proving that the United States military does more than kill people and break things.
May not agree with this group on everything, but stopping the ACLU is high on my list
A conservative/moderate black blogger.
Another sensible American
Sex, Crime, and Corruption in the Democratic Party
Music, Politics, Motorcycles
Maggie's Farm: Freedom from nags, cranks, government, do-gooders, control-freaks and idiots is all that we ask for.
A blog dedicated to "Documenting Saddam Hussein's support of Terrorism"
The blog of one of my fellow bloggers on the Civilian Gun Self-Defense Blog
J. Norman Heath's Blog--a circus rigger and Second Amendment scholar (really!)
Buckeye Firearms Association, for you Ohio gun owners and activists
Click here for a FREE NEWSLETTER on Ohio Gun Rights from Buckeye Firearms Association!
Another conservative.
Neocon Blues
Conservative Oasis
Other Idaho Bloggers
Bubbleheads is a retired submariner
An Idaho State University student. A Democrat. Someday, she'll start paying income taxes and change.
A retired Las Vegas stagehand, of all things.
archives
Search only this site: Click here and enter your search string at the beginning of the search field.
Other Recent Articles About Slavery
I was sitting in a doctor's office this morning, and I found an article by Andrew Cockburn that covered some of the same material that Landesman did--and some of it seems to confirm Landesman. Andrew Cockburn, "21st Century Slaves," National Geographic, September 2003, 2-25. Concerning Jack Shafer's criticism of Landesman about where are the convictions? Why aren't police doing something about this if they know about it? On p. 23:In 1995 more than 70 Thai women were rescued after laboring for years behind barbed wire in the Los Angeles suburb of El Monte,... while federal and state law enforcement repeatedly failed to obtain a proper warrant to search the premises.
Cockburn then goes on to list other cases where federal law enforcement managed to free slaves in Washington and Florida--in one case, seizing millons of dollars in ill-gotten wealth. None of these were sex slave cases, but they show that slavery does exist in the U.S., and often involving large numbers of slaves.
Cockburn's story on p. 22 includes a picture at a shelter for child prostitutes in Southern California. The caption explains that one girl was "forced to work as a prostitute in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Nevada before escaping her captor." The child prostitutes shelter has helped about 10,000 victims over the last 25 years--although I would assume that most were runaways, and not slaves.
Another photograph on p. 25 includes the caption explaining that the pictured "three boys living in a Mexico shelter, one 12 years old, the other two no more than 15. All had been shuttled between Tijuana and San Diego, California, and prostituted to pedophiles."
None of this confirms the scale of the sex slavery in the U.S. that Landesman describes--although Cockburn's article mentioned many of the same figures, and seems to accept that the scale Landesman indicates is plausible.
Understanding Engineers
An engineer was crossing a road one day when a frog called out to him and said, "If you kiss me, I'll turn into a beautiful princess." He bent over, picked up the frog and put it in his pocket. The frog spoke up again and said, "If you kiss me and turn me back into a beautiful princess, I will stay with you for one week." The engineer took the frog out of his pocket, smiled at it and returned it to the pocket.
The frog then cried out, "If you kiss me and turn me back into a princess, I'll stay with you and do ANYTHING you want." Again the engineer took the frog out, smiled at it and put it back into his pocket.
Finally, the frog asked, "What is the matter? I've told you I'm a beautiful princess, and that I'll stay with you for a week and do anything you want. Why won't you kiss me?" The engineer said, "Look, I'm an engineer. I don't have time for a girlfriend, but a talking frog, now that's cool."
The Sky Finally Cleared in Boise
And so the Photon Instruments refractor finally had a chance! I am a little disappointed.
First of all, it took a very long time for the refractor to finish cooling--although I will be the first to admit that this was a very dramatic drop in temperatures this evening. After two hours, it seems that the optics stopped changing.
Viewing conditions were less than ideal. While transparency was pretty good, and even turbulence was low, we have a slightly more than half-full Moon, which definitely puts a lot of skyglow into the sky. To give me a standard of comparison, I put out the Televue Ranger that I have as well.
Saturn
In the Photon Instruments, the Cassini Division was visible as a gray line, pretty much all the way around Saturn, at 127x. The darker yellowish cloud bands above the equator were visible. Unfortunately, the image was not crisp, and the planet and rings were clearly more yellow than they should have been.
In the Televue Ranger, Cassini's Division was not really visible, even as a darkening of the rings, at 120x. There was only a hint of the cloud bands on the planet. The image was crisp--like a good photograph, and both planet and rings were close to brilliant white, with just a hint of yellow.
M42 (Orion Nebula)
The clouds around the Trapezium at 91x were clearly visible, and seemed to have some detail. The four stars of the Trapezium were visible, crisp, and not wavering. Very nice. None of the fainter stars were visible. Unfortunately, by the time I dragged out the Ranger, clouds had obscured M42.
Moon
This was a real pain to look at--the Photon is so long, and the mount on which it sits is so low, that I had to lie down to look through it. At 91x and below, the Moon was glorious: sharp, no discernable chromatic aberration. At 127x, the image was beginning to fuzz up a bit, and I noticed a slight purple and yellow edge on the limb and terminator. The color was not objectionable, but it was, I'm sure, the source of the fuzziness.
Star Test
One of the traditional measures of the preciseness of a refractor is the star test, where you examine the rings that appear around a bright star at high magnification just inside and just outside focus. To the extent that the rings are circular and symmetrical, and similar on both sides, you have a well corrected piece of glass. The rings were easily visible when looking at Rigel at 127x inside focus (the outermost ring being way too heavy), but the rings were simply not there outside focus. I can't remember right now if that means severe undercorrection, or severe overcorrection, and I'm too tired to look it up this evening.
However, I did this while the glass was still cooling. I may also need a bit more magnification to have a proper test. I used a green filter, which often helps to get a more consistent set of diffraction rings, but it didn't help. I'll try again.
Overall, I would say this telescope is a bargain--but it does not provide any advantage over my 8" reflector--and it may actually be somewhat inferior. I am not sure that it makes any sense for me to keep it. It may make more sense to resell it, and spend the extra money on an apochromat.
UPDATE: I had the 6mm and 9mm eyepieces reversed in the eyepiece case. I was actually using 190x on the Photon Instruments. This still doesn't help the Ranger much. When I used the 9mm last night so that I was comparing 127x on the Photon with 120x on the Ranger, the views--and the amount of detail visible on Saturn--were very similar. In both cases, Cassini's Division was just barely visible, as was the cloud band just above the equator. The Ranger's color was better, and the image was crisper.
The Photon does a better job on faint objects, of course, because of the extra aperture--almost four times the light gathering ability, and it is a bargain by comparison. But I sure don't need the Photon, and the Ranger, and my 8" reflector.
Blog As Weapon!
From the U.S. Navy: The ONR and NUWC are leading a government-industry team to develop a blog as a promising new approach to speeding up the exchange of information on new defense technologies—and thereby speed up getting the technologies into the field.
The blog is one of 12 pilot programs, selected for funding from a field of 120, for demonstration through the DoD Rapid Acquisition Incentive-Net Centricity (RAI-NC) initiative. The RAI-NC, managed by the office of the Pentagon’s chief information officer, aims to demonstrate processes to speed up the development of net-centric, “transformational” approaches to defense technology development and acquisition.
Marylanders: Your Legislature is Considering an Assault Weapons Ban
I'm confused--is SB 288 a replacement for an existing assault weapons ban? I can't imagine that your masters would have left you this much freedom for so long. Of course, these guns are so dangerous that you can't be trusted with them--but law enforcement, of course, can be.
The Democrats are anxious for all the voters to forget about their anti-gun past--and yet Democrats in Maryland are still busily trying to buy off the deranged set that thinks gun control makes more sense than locking up violent felons.
The Burmese Sex Slave Trade
Here's a description of a documentary from two years ago. This doesn't have any direct relevance to Landesman's article about the sex slave business in the U.S., but it is a reminder that there are parts of the world where this stuff just happens, and the government has financial reasons not to do anything about it:Their stories are horrifying, none more so than that of “ZuZu,” a seemingly innocent 16-year-old who was raped as a child and, like so many other girls, sold into prostitution to pay her family’s debts. The details are staggering: Zuzu recalls being forced to have sex with several men at a time, narrowly escaping a leech farm, and suffering a violently induced abortion, which “made everyone happy because then I could go back to work.”
Leech farm? A friend who hear the director being interview summarized it like this:The "leech farm" mentioned in that capsule summary turns out to be more horrible than one could possibly imagine. It is said that some girls who refuse further prostitution, are sold into even worse circumstances. In one case the new "job" was to go into leech infested water to feed the leeches with one's own blood. The leeches were being grown as traditional medicinals.
NAACP Image Award Nominee: R. Kelly
From the Howard University student newspaper: Take a look at black awards shows and it just might make you sick to your stomach. Today's predominately African-American awards shows have typically become breeding grounds for stereotypical depictions of blacks. The black community, young and old, was outraged by the farcical and embarrassing nature of last year's Source Awards. Besides that, each year we watch the Soul Train Awards lean further away from soul and closer towards thug life. Now, much to our dismay, yet another black awards show is going to the dogs.
From WLS TV in Chicago:
The NAACP recently nominated R. Kelly for an Image Award.
While there is no doubting R. Kelly's genius when it comes to making hit songs and all around "feel good" music, we believe this should merit him a Grammy Award, not an Image Award. R. Kelly's talent does not automatically make him a positive image for black people, and we are sadly misguided as a people if we choose our role models based on how well they play ball or make a hit record.
The truth of the matter is that R. Kelly is an accused child molester. As if to add insult to injury, the African American community (NAACP included) has decided to overlook the fact that he was caught on tape engaged in scandalous acts with a minor. Since when is this the ideal image to be applauded?January 30, 2004 (Bartow, Florida) — Lawyers for R-and-B singer R-Kelly have asked a judge in Florida to suppress nude pictures found on a digital camera, saying they were seized during an illegal search.
Yes, yes, he hasn't been convicted on anything yet, but why nominate someone for an "Image" award who is awaiting trial on such serious charges? There is an explanation, of course:
The 37-year-old singer is charged with 12 counts of child pornography in Florida. He's also awaiting trial on child pornography charges in Chicago.Kweisi Mfume, the president of the NAACP, admits there's a problem with the way the NAACP picks its nominees because half the voters aren't actually members, but people in the entertainment industry.
Of course. The charges are serious on Planet Earth, but in the entertainment industry, perhaps not as bad as say, being a Republican.
Confusion
Professor Volokh points to a disturbing piece on the Palestinan Authority web site that tries to blame the Jews for murdering Jesus. What makes this piece (written by someone named Mark Glenn) so weird is that:
1. If he is trying to appeal to Christians, it makes no sense. Christianity teaches that Jesus had to die, to atone for the sins of the world. Blaming Jews for that death makes about as much sense as me "blaming" GM for my Corvette (scroll to the bottom).
2. No Muslim could ever properly call Jesus "Christ," which means Messiah. Islam teaches that Jesus was a prophet--not Messiah. Why would the Palestinian Authority consider this appropriate, except as cynical and ineffective propaganda aimed at Christians?
UPDATE: A reader points me to a page that claims that the Qur'an teaches that Jesus did not die on the cross, but was swapped for an infidel. Is this considered a legitimate view of Islam?
Mel Gibson and the Holocaust
Some people are a bit sensitive about Mel Gibson at the moment, perhaps because of Gibson's new movie (which my sister saw in a special private screening--and she was powerfully impressed and moved by it). Professor David Bernstein, whose opinions I respect and often agree with, asks if Gibson is a Holocaust denier:The following, however, is at least troubling and deserves further explanation:
I think Professor Bernstein is trying a little too hard to tease meaning out of this statement.
'YOU'RE GOING to have to go on record. The Holocaust happened, right?" Peggy Noonan asks of Mel Gibson in the Reader's Digest for March.
There are some serious problems with this statement, include the gratuitous lumping of the Holocaust with other tragedies that were not relevant in context, that suggest an aggressive hostility to Noonan's question (the question itself would seem a bit strange, but for the fact that Gibson's father is a Holocaust denier), and at best a desire to put the Holocaust into "context".
Gibson: "I have friends and parents of friends who have numbers on their arms. The guy who taught me Spanish was a Holocaust survivor. He worked in a concentration camp in France. Yes, of course. Atrocities happened. War is horrible. The Second World War killed tens of millions of people. Some of them were Jews in concentration camps. Many people lost their lives. In the Ukraine, several million starved to death between 1932 and 1933. During the last century, 20 million people died in the Soviet Union."
I read Gibson's remarks as saying the Holocaust was a very bad thing, and it was part of a century of similar mass murders. Some people try to see the Holocaust as special; unfortunately, there was nothing terribly special about it. It was larger and better organized than the Armenian genocide; it was specific to an ethnic group, unlike the atrocities in the Soviet Union, Red China, and Cambodia. It has received far more attention than similarly monstrous atrocities throughout history, perhaps because Jews in the U.S. have been in especially influential positions in the publishing and media business. This doesn't mean the Holocaust is unimportant, and I don't begrudge the efforts to make sure that we never forget. It does mean that the lesser known atrocities of the 20th century need more popular attention.
William Raspberry's Column About Marriage
Raspberry, of course, being a liberal--a black liberal that--has to denigrate the value of Bush's proposal to encourage and defend marriage--but he recognizes that the concern is legitimate and serious: The president's proposal may not be entirely serious, but the state of marriage in America is. And when marriage is in trouble, the society is in trouble.
Take, for instance, the sacrifices that are necessary to raise the kind of healthy, happy and competent children we want. These sacrifices are almost always unequal between husband and wife. They are tolerable only if marriage is accepted as a permanent arrangement.
Marriage has always been a way of tying fathers to their offspring. But we've come to believe that this is no longer necessary because women (in economic terms, at least) no longer require the commitment of their children's fathers. When dads become superfluous, it becomes more difficult for men and boys to see useful social roles for themselves. Too often, young men become threats to the families and communities that might once have considered them assets.
This is particularly true in America's inner cities. The decline in marriage may have begun with the decline in the number of eligible (meaning employed) men. But it accelerated when we abandoned the notion of "illegitimacy" and, in effect, declared marriage irrelevant to families.
More Threats to Free Speech
More reminders that some ideas are so threatening to the status quo that they will not be tolerated: BRUSSELS – One of Belgium's leading civil rights groups has announced it intends to sue Belgian cardinal Gustaaf Joos for violating the country's anti-discrimination laws.
Joos said in a recent magazine interview that he believed that 90-95 percent of gay people were “sexual perverts” and that the remainder needed help.
The Centre for Equal Opportunities and the Fight Against Racism (CEOFAR), which receives government funding, said that it had decided to sue the cardinal because it found his views “unacceptable”.
The Rotenburg Cannibal Is Sentenced
The Cranky Professor had been expressing concern that Germany's "probationary case for readmission to Western Civilization" was hanging in the balance, depending on whether it was possible to get a conviction for killing and eating someone--when the cannibal had videotaped the crime. Good news (sort of) from Germany, however: the cannibal was convicted, but of manslaughter, not murder. The story is still chilling: Meiwes’ video of the killing, which made for chilling viewing inside the courtroom, has convinced prosecutors that Bernd-Jürgen B.’s death was voluntary.
Oddly enough, while the article admitted that Meiwes had done this for sexual gratification, it neglected to mention that this was a form of homosexual activity--and that there were hundreds of others who had volunteered to be Meiwes meal.
The video shows Meiwes slaughtering his victim in a scene straight out of the "Texas Chainsaw Massacre," complete with meat hooks, a cage and a butcher’s table.
...
A psychiatrist testifying in the case last week described Meiwes as fit to stand trial. "There’s no evidence of a psychological disorder," said George Stolpmann. He added that the 42-year-old had a "schizoid personality" and has problems forming relationships. "What we have here is an inability to have warm and tender feelings toward others," he said.
In December, Meiwes said he was not acting out of sexual desire when he killed Bernd-Jürgen B., but rather out of loneliness and the desire for the brother he never had. I wanted "someone to be part of me," he told the court.
This week Meiwes told the court he regretted the deed and would not repeat it. "I had my big kick and don’t need to do this any more," he said.
Jack Shafer and the Sex Slave Business
Jack Shafer's column at Slate tries to discredit Peter Landesman's recent article about the international sex slave trade. Shafer raises a couple of good points, but over all, I am not impressed with his refutation. Landesman might indeed have gotten carried away, horrified by a few isolated incidents; he might be sloppy; he might be even making it up, as at least one critic implied by comparing Landesman to Stephen Glass. Shafer's critique, however, does not do much to persuade me that Landesman is wrong:Landesman's breathless performance, in which he asserts that "hundreds" of "stash houses" inhabited by foreign sex slaves dot America's metropolitan landscape, offers almost nothing in the way of verifiable facts about the incidence and prevalence of this heinous practice.
Gee, why would it be anonymous? Many of the participants are ashamed of what they have been forced to do; many are afraid of corrupt Mexican police; many more are certainly afraid of the people engaged in this trade coming and murdering them.
Landesman's supporting evidence is vague. Where it is not vague, it is anecdotal. Where it is anecdotal, it is often anonymous, too.
Anecdotal? As Shafer admits, this isn't exactly easy to take surveys on. "Excuse me, how many teenagers have you raped and turned into prostitutes under threat of death?" Shafer claims:But except for prosecutions and border interdictions, there's little hard data about the number of sex slaves smuggled into the country. And that makes the numbers incredibly elastic.
And then Shafer quotes U.S. government statistics that match Landesman's numbers, because Landesman quotes those numbers. Sure they are elastic. Why does Shafer therefore discount the government statistics that Landesman quotes?
Shafer doesn't consider one of Landesman's sources credible:he lets Kevin Bales of the nonprofit group Free the Slaves hype his premise with the speculation that the number is "at least 10,000 a year." How credible is Bales? How credible are his numbers? Bales claims 27 million slaves around the world, which is only 10 times larger than the estimate of the Anti-Slavery Society, which puts the number at 2.7 million.
Which of them is correct? I don't know. The Anti-Slavery Society's estimate, however, by their own admission, is probably low:In arriving at our estimate of 2.7 million slaves, we use the common law definition of slave (see the next page: "What Is Slavery?"). This definition excludes excludes other forms of servitude, such as bonded labor and forced labor. In addition, it only includes one category of trafficked women and children. Some would probably say that our definition - which is the common law definition - is too narrow.
I don't know why Shafer didn't give the URL for the Anti-Slavery Society's page where they actually give the 2.7 million estimate, instead of their home page. It would have simplified demonstrating that Free the Slaves' estimate might be too high, but not clearly and obviously so--and the Anti-Slavery Society's estimate is not an obvious contradiction.
Shafer also has this curious paragraph:State Department go-to guy on slavery John Miller tells Landesman that the 10,000 new sex slaves a year estimate by Bales "could be low." But the fact is nobody in the field seems to have a good handle on slave traffic numbers or the sex slave population in the United States. So, when Bales surmises that there are between 30,000 to 50,000 sex slaves in the United States at any time, don't feel the need to believe him. Nobody really knows the true answer, but we do know whose interests are served by any inflation of the numbers.
Whose interests are served by inflation of the numbers? Shafer seems to see someone getting some benefit from inflating these numbers. The State Department? John Miller? The organization Free the Slaves? Law enforcement agencies?
Shafer's next paragraph utterly startles me:Landesman introduces other dubious figures. He writes early in the piece that "law-enforcement officials say [there] are dozens of active stash houses and apartments in the New York metropolitan area--mirroring hundreds more in other major cities like Los Angeles, Atlanta and Chicago--where under-age girls and young women from dozens of countries are trafficked and held captive." But if police know of dozens of active stash houses in the metro area and hundreds more in other cities, why haven't they busted them? If they have, Landesman isn't telling.
We have this curious document in America. It's called a Bill of Rights. It means that the police can't just go kicking in doors because they believe that a crime is taking place. They need probable cause to get a search warrant, or to see a crime in progress to skip the warrant. I do not doubt that you could ask law-enforcement officials how many crack houses there are in their city, and get at least within an order of magnitude of the correct number. I can't believe that Shafer doesn't know that police officers often have knowledge that is reasonably accurate, but not actionable.
Shafer attacks the credibility of one of Landesman's witnesses:One of Landesman's pseudonymous ex-sex slaves, "Montserrat," says she's lived in Mexico City "since she escaped from her trafficker [Alejandro] four years ago." But Montserrat also talks about how Alejandro took her to see Scary Movie 2 in Portland, Ore. This would be impossible. Scary Movie 2 was released in 2001.
Alejandro might well have taken "Montserrat," to see Scary Movie (released in 2000, now four years ago), and having seen Scary Movie 2 in the meantime, she has conflated them in her memory. Also, as people who do surveys will tell you, the problem of "telescoping" memories is quite real; events that took place last week are pretty clear about how long ago they were; get back before a year, and two years, three years, four years, all sort to slip together. Did she escape in 2000? In early 2001? In late 2001?
Shafer has another criticism that at first glance sounds quite reasonable: Other minor annoyances populate "The Girls Next Door." Landesman writes about a Glendale, Calif., highway rest stop that's used as a transfer point for sex slaves. Glendale is a densely populated Los Angeles suburb, like Pasadena or Burbank. If there's a highway rest stop there, it's news to me.
"Highway rest stop" has a very clear meaning to you and I. I wonder if it has the same meaning to "Montserrat" as it does to an American. A place with restrooms, and a couple of benches might well be a "highway rest stop" to someone not yet familiar with the United States. I also wonder if "Montserrat" said "Glendale" and Landesman assumed "Glendale, California." Glendale, Arizona would be a plausible division point for slaves headed west on I-10 to Southern California, as well as north on I-17 to Flagstaff, and then to San Jose, California.
Shafer also attacks the credibility of another witness, Andrea, who is uncertain of her real name and age, because she was sold so young: Slate colleague Josh Levin notes that much of the sensational material in "The Girls Next Door" comes from "Andrea," a source who can't remember her real name or age. Andrea does remember, though, that one American businessman read to her from the Bible before and after sex, that she witnessed a 4-year-old boy being purchased for $500, that she was regularly passed off to customers at Disneyland, and that one regular john was a child psychologist. (It's difficult to imagine that tidbit coming up in conversation.)
Let's take those one at a time.
1. Does anyone find it plausible that a guy very guilt-ridden about what he was doing might salve his conscience by reading from the Bible before and after purchasing an act of prostitution? I find it shameful and abhorrent, but not unbelievable. A few years back, one of San Francisco civil servants--I think he may have been the controller--was arrested in a San Francisco brothel with a 14 year old prostitute. News coverage at the time reported that she was told to call him, "Daddy." (And yes, he was definitely old enough to have children that age.) Unbelievable? No, just repulsive.
2. Andrea claims to have seen "a 4-year-old boy being purchased for $500." What is hard to believe about that? There is a whole organization filled with guys who would certainly pay that much: the North American Man-Boy Love Association.
3. Regularly passed off to customers at Disneyland? Read Andrea's own account: ''At Disneyland there would be people doing drop-offs and pickups for kids. It's a big open area full of kids, and nobody pays attention to nobody. They would kind of quietly say, 'Go over to that person,' and you would just slip your hand into theirs and say, 'I was looking for you, Daddy.' Then that person would move off with one or two or three of us.''
What's so hard to believe about this?
4. Shafer finds it hard to believe that the occupation of a customer would come up in conversation. Why is that hard to believe? I don't find it hard to believe that the pimp would tell the prostitutes that their customers were people of importance: police officers, child psychologists, and other status occupations. Landesman quotes Andrea on this very topic:["]We had customers who were police, so you were not going to go talk to a cop. We had this customer from Nevada who was a child psychologist, so you're not going to go talk to a social worker. So who are you going to talk to?''
It is possible that Landesman has really screwed up this story good, exaggerating it horribly. But what he is describing--a vast international sex slave ring, with children terrorized into obedience--isn't new. San Francisco from the Gold Rush forward for decades had a huge problem with thousands of Chinese girls sold into slavery, terrorized into working as prostitutes.When she was on further use as a prostitute, the girl was placed in a small cell where she had the choice of taking her own life or being murdered.[Anne Seagraves, Soiled Doves: Prostitution in the Early West (Hayden, Idaho: Wesanne Publications, 1994), 139]
Other accounts that I have read indicated that she was given a large quantity of opium with which to overdose, no food, no water, and locked in complete darkness.
Henry Mayhew was a journalist in mid-19th century London. His accounts of things that he saw--four year olds being drugged so that they would not resist being raped by very old men in brothels, London police taking bribes to ignore girls being held against their will for prostitution--horrified polite British society. Rather than fix the social problems and police corruption that Mayhew exposed polite society blamed Mayhew for informing them how bad things were. I fear that some of what is going with the reaction to Landesman's article is liberals reacting in shock and horror at the awful discovery that there are monsters among us.
If what Landesman describes is rare, it is tragic, evil, but it doesn't say much about our society. What Landesman's article depicts, however, is not just a few slavemaster pimps, but easily dozens to hundreds of them--and even more disturbing, at least tens of thousands of customers a year in the U.S. that enjoy sex with toddlers, brutal sex, against those who are completely defenseless.
What calls itself liberalism today is premised on the delusion that human beings are fundamentally good, and only systems make people bad. To confront that there is a large subculture that needs to be caged is very, very disturbing. Maybe Landesman lost all perspective on this, letting a few horrifying and rare cases freak him out. But I think it is just as likely that Landesman, like Henry Mayhew a century and a half ago in London, revealed a dark underside of our society that is just a bit too painful for liberals to confront.
Another News Story That I Would Not Make Up
This seems to be from one of the Norwegian TV stations: Animal sex is not illegal in Sweden, and every year between 200 and 300 pets are injured because of sexual assaults.
Oh, and no surprise about the end of the article:
The estimate was presented by Svenska Veterin?rforbundet, the Swedish veterinary organization, and it is now trying to make the authorities and the public more aware of animals? suffering. The organization claim the problem has increased during the last couple of years, even if most people are unaware of it.
?We have seen an increase since 1999 when child pornography became illegal,? said Johan Beck-Friis. ?It appears, in other words, as there are some people who have replaced children with animals. In both circumstances, it is sex with defenceless individuals.?
...
Animal porn
The fact that animal sex is becoming an increasing problem can be indicated by the mere fact that there is an increasing selection of animal porn at video rentals and there an increasingly number of websites with animal pornography is surfacing. Not illegal
Justice Scalia's dissent in Lawrence warned about where ruling homosexuality is a constitutionally protected act would take our society.
In contrast with most other countries, animal sex is not illegal in Sweden. It was decriminalized in 1944 in connection with the decriminalization of homosexual sex.
Why Do Liberals Hate George Bush?
Bush is asking for a 15% increase in funding for the National Endowment for the Arts. If I had my way, the whole program would be scrapped. As Professor David Bernstein points out, Bush is, in many respects, outliberaling the liberals.
Ann Coulter Has An Amusing and Ferocious Column About John Kerry
Np permanent link yet:Kerry sure as hell can't talk to anyone about the plight of the middle class. Kerry's life experience consists of living off other men's money by marrying their wives and daughters.
For over 30 years, Kerry's primary occupation has been stalking lonely heiresses. Not to get back to his combat experience, but Kerry sees a room full of wealthy widows as "a target-rich environment." This is a guy whose experience dealing with tax problems is based on spending his entire adult life being supported by rich women. What does a kept man know about taxes?
In 1970, Kerry married into the family of Julia Thorne -- a family estimated to be worth about $300 million. She got depressed, so he promptly left her and was soon seen catting around with Hollywood starlets, mostly while the cad was still married. (Apparently, JFK really was his mentor.) Thorne is well-bred enough to say nothing ill of her Lothario ex-husband. He is, after all, the father of her children -- a fact that never seemed to constrain him.
When Kerry was about to become the latest Heinz family charity, he sought to have his marriage to Thorne annulled, despite the fact that it had produced two children. It seems his second meal ticket, Teresa Heinz, wanted the first marriage annulled -- and Heinz is worth more than $700 million. Kerry claims he will stand up to powerful interests, but he can't even stand up to his wife.
Interesting Quotes From Homosexuals About Pedophilia
I found this recently. (The numbers are footnotes, scroll to the bottom.)
Those of my readers who are homosexuals and are horrified by pedophilia (and I believe you when you say that you are horrified by it) need to answer me a single question: why is it so easy to find people who identify themselves as homosexuals and write in defense in child molestation? Maybe they are a minority--but in the cases below, it would be like quoting President Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleeza Rice, and Donald Rumsfeld on U.S. foreign policy--and claiming that this was a weird, minority viewpoint in the Republican Party: The Historical Connection between Pedophilia and the Gay Rights Movement
Hey, maybe I've been misled by the number of homosexuals whom I have talked to, or whose work that I have read, defending child molestation. Maybe they are really a weird, strange, tiny little minority of homosexuals. But it sure seems that other people are having no problem finding other publications by homosexuals promoting child molestation (excuse me, "intergenerational sex").
David Thorstad is a homosexual activist and historian of the gay rights movement. 48 He is a former president of New York's Gay Activists Alliance (gaa), a prototype activist group founded in December 1969. The gaa at its inception opposed age of consent laws, which prohibited adults from having sex with children. 49 Thorstad is also a pedophile and founding member of the North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).
Thorstad argues that there is a natural and undeniable connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. He expresses bitterness that the gay rights movement has, in his view, abandoned pedophilia. Thorstad writes: "Boy-lovers were involved in the gay movement from the beginning, and their presence was tolerated. Gay youth groups encouraged adults to attend their dances. . . . There was a mood of tolerance, even joy at discovering the myriad of lifestyles within the gay and lesbian subculture." 50
The inaugural issue of the Gay Community News in 1979 published a "Statement to the Gay Liberation Movement on the Issue of Man/Boy Love," which challenged the movement to return to a vision of sexual liberation. It argued that "the ultimate goal of gay liberation is the achievement of sexual freedom for all—not just equal rights for 'lesbian and gay men,' but also freedom of sexual expression for young people and children."
In the early years there was some reluctance to accept pedophilia, primarily among feminist and lesbian activist groups. In March 1979 the Lesbian Feminist Liberation (lfl) accusing "so-called Man/Boy Lovers" of "attempting to legitimize sex between children and adults. . . . Feminists easily recognize this as the latest attempt to make palatable the sexual exploitation of children." The coalition went on record as opposing "the sexual abuse of children by heterosexual or homosexual persons." 51
Despite this opposition, Thorstad claims that by 1985 homosexual pedophiles had won acceptance within the gay movement. He cites Jim Kepner, then curator of the International Gay and Lesbian Archives in Los Angeles: "A point I've been trying to make is that if we reject the boylovers in our midst today we'd better stop waving the banner of the Ancient Greeks, of Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Oscar Wilde, Walt Whitman, Horatio Alger, and Shakespeare. We'd better stop claiming them as part of our heritage unless we are broadening our concept of what it means to be gay today." 52
In 1985 NAMBLA was admitted as a member in New York's council of Lesbian and Gay Organizations as well as the International Gay Association—now the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA). In the mid-1990's ILGA's association with NAMBLA and other pedophile groups cost the organization it's status as a Non-Governmental Organization in the United Nations.
ILGA's renewed attempt to gain admittance to the UN was rejected again in April 2000 because the organization "did not document that it had purged pedophile groups such as [NAMBLA]." The Washington Times reports that Ishtiag H. Anrabi, Pakistani delegate to the UN Economic and Social Council, expressed concern that ILGA was continuing to be secretive about ties with pedophile groups: "For more than a year, the ILGA has refused to provide documentation or allow review of its membership list to demonstrate that pedophilia groups have been expelled." 53
Pedophile Themes Abound in Gay Literature
The late "beat" poet Allen Ginsberg illustrates the seamless connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. Many know Ginsberg as an illustrious "out" homosexual poet: fewer are aware that he was also a pedophile.
Biographer Raymond-Jean Frontain refers to Ginsberg's publications in both NAMBLA Bulletin and NAMBLA Journal. He discusses how Ginsberg's biographers failed to discuss his poems that contained pederastic themes:
Although both Shumacher and Barry Miles (Ginsberg's initial biographer) frankly discuss Ginsberg's sexual politics, neither refers to his involvement with the controversial North American Man/Boy Love Association. . . . I reread Collected Poems and Ginsberg's two subsequent collections, surprised by the pattern of references to anal intercourse and to pederasty that emerged. 54
Ginsberg was one of the first of a growing number of homosexual writers who cater to the fascination with pedophilia in the gay community. Mary Eberstadt, writing in the Weekly Standard, documents how the taboo against sex with children continues to erode—with the impetus coming from homosexual writers. 55
Revealingly, the examples she provides of pedophilia in current literature come from gay fiction. Eberstadt cites the Village Voice, which states that "Gay fiction is rich with idyllic accounts of 'intergenerational relationships,' as such affairs are respectfully called these days." 56 Other examples of pedophilia-themed gay fiction include:
In the introduction of the "mainstream" homosexual anthology Penguin Book on International Gay Writing, David Leavitt notes matter-of-factly that "Another 'forbidden' topic from which European writers seem less likely to shrink is the love of older men for young boys." Leavitt praises one book with a pedophilic theme included in the anthology as a "coolly assured narrative [which] compels the reader to imagine the world from a perspective he might ordinarily condemn." 57
Several texts included in another anthology, The Gay Canon: Great Books Every Gay Man Should Read, feature scenes of man-boy sex. One such book is praised as "an operatic adventure into the realms of love, personality, ambition and art . . . a pure joy to read." The protagonist is "a pedophile's dream: the mind of a man in the body of a boy." 58 Another novel which includes graphic descriptions of sexual violence against boys is said to "[tear] straight to the heart of one of the greatest sources, community-wide, of 1990's gay angst: What to do with men who love boys?" 59
Yet another anthology of homosexual fiction, A History of Gay Literature: The Male Tradition, published by Yale University Press, includes "a longish chapter on 'Boys and Boyhood' which is a seemingly definitive account of pro-pedophile literary works." 60 The author appears more concerned with the feelings and emotions of the man than with his boy victim. He explores the question of "whether or not you regard [having sex with boys] as a way of retreating from life or, on the contrary, as a way of engaging with it at its most honest and least corrupted level." 61
A significant percentage of books that have appeared on the Gay Men's Press fiction bestseller list contain pedophilia themes, including:
Some Boys: described as a "memoir of a lover of boys" that "evokes the author's young friends across four decades." 62
For a Lost Soldier: the story of a sexual relationship between a soldier and an eleven-year-old boy, set during World War II. 63
A Good Start, Considering: yet another story about an eleven-year-old boy (!) who suffers sexual abuse but is rescued by a teenager who "offers him love and affection" 64
Terre Haute: billed as "A poetic novel of sexual awakening in the American Midwest, tracing an adolescent's journey from introspection to perilous desire."
Shiva and Arun: the story of two Indian adolescents who "discover early on the joys of sex."
Teardrops on My Drum: barefoot kids in 1920's Liverpool search for "adventure, love and sex."
Pro-pedophilia Publications
Recent years have seen the appearance of publications that lend a scholarly veneer to the fascination with pedophilia in the gay community. Such publications attempt to make the case for "intergenerational intimacy." The nation's largest gay publisher, Alyson Publications, which distributes Daddy's Roommate and other homosexual books that promote homosexuality to children, publishes books advocating man-boy sex, including:
Paedophilia: The Radical Case, which contains detailed information on how to engage in sexual relations with young boys. 65
The Age Taboo, another defense of pedophilia which claims: "Boy-lovers . . . are not child molesters. The child abusers are . . . parents who force their staid morality onto the young people in their custody." 66
The Journal of Homosexuality and Pedophilia
The Journal of Homosexuality is viewed as the premier "mainstream" English-language publication of the gay movement. One prominent editor is John DeCecco, a psychologist at San Francisco State University who also serves on the editorial board of the Dutch pedophile journal Paidika. It is therefore not surprising to see pedophilia promoted on its pages.
In 1990 the Journal of Homosexuality published a series of essays on pedophilia that were eventually published as Male Inter-Generational Intimacy: Historical, Socio-Psychological, and Legal Perspectives, edited by pedophile Edward Brongersma. None of the essays offered any substantive criticism of pedophilia: most blatantly promoted man-boy love as the natural right of homosexuals.
In 1999 Helmut Graupner, wrote an article on pedophilia in the Journal of Homosexuality, in which he claims: "Man/boy and woman/girl relations without doubt are same-sex relations and they do constitute an aspect of gay and lesbian life." Graupner argues that, as such, consensual sexual relations between adult homosexuals and youths as young as fourteen qualifies as a "gay rights issue." 67
The fascination with pedophilia continues to be a cause of concern even within the gay community. Lesbian columnist Paula Martinac, writing in the homosexual newspaper Washington Blade, states:
[S]ome gay men still maintain that an adult who has same-sex relations with someone under the legal age of consent is on some level doing the kid a favor by helping to bring him or her 'out.' It's not pedophilia, this thinking goes—pedophilia refers only to little kids. Instead, adult-youth sex is viewed as an important aspect of gay culture, with a history dating back to 'Greek love' of ancient times. This romanticized version of adult-youth sexual relations has been a staple of gay literature and has made appearances, too, in gay-themed films. 68
Martinac adds that "When some gay men venerate adult-youth sex as affirming while simultaneously declaring 'We're not pedophiles,' they send an inconsistent message to society. . . . The lesbian and gay community will never be successful in fighting the pedophile stereotype until we all stop condoning sex with young people." 69
Notes
48. Thorstad is co-author, with John Lauritsen, of The early homosexual rights movement (1864-1935) (New York: Times Change Press, 1974).
49. David Thorstad, "May/Boy Love and the American Gay Movement" Journal of Homosexuality 20 (1990): 252.
50. Ibid., p. 253.
51. Ibid., p. 258.
52. Ibid., p. 266.
53. George Archibald, "U.N. Group Keeps Ban on Gay Lobby," Washington Times (May 1, 2002).
54. Raymond-Jean Frontain, "The Works of Allen Ginsberg," Journal of Homosexuality 34 (1997).
55. Mary Eberstadt, "'Pedophilia Chic' Reconsidered" The Weekly Standard 6 (January 8, 2001).
56. Ibid., p. 21.
57. Ibid., p. 22.
58. Ibid.
59. Ibid.
60. Ibid., p. 23.
61. Ibid. Emphasis added by Eberstadt.
62. Ibid., p. 23.
63. Ibid.
64. From the Gay Men's Press website: www.gmppubs.co.uk/cgi-bin/web_store/web_store.cgi
65. Tom O'Carroll, Paedophilia: The Radical Case (Boston: Alyson Publications, 1982).
66. Daniel Tsang, editor, The Age Taboo: Gay Male Sexuality, Power, and Consent (Boston: Alyson Publications ; London : Gay Men's Press, 1981), p.144.
67. Helmut Graupner, "Love Versus Abuse: Crossgenerational Sexual Relations of Minors: A Gay Rights Issue?" Journal of Homosexuality 37 (1999): 23, 26.
68. Paula Martinac, "Mixed Messages on Pedophilia Need to be Clarified, Unified," Washington Blade (March 15, 2002).
69. Ibid.
Woman Hates Gun; Uses Gun; Loves Gun
This article is about how Susan Gonzalez learned to get past her fear of a gun:Bleeding and weakened from the bullet wound in her chest, Susan Gonzalez aimed her husband's .22-caliber pistol, the one she hated, and emptied it into one of the robbers who had burst through the front door of her rural Jacksonville home.
Those shots ended the life of one robber, led to a life prison term for another and became an epiphany for Gonzalez, a 41-year-old mother of five who runs a photography studio.
Gonzalez had always feared guns, never wanted a gun and argued with her husband, Mike, to please not keep guns in their home.
Save Time! Let a Computer Make Up Your Conspiracy Theories!
Remember when Mad magazine had those MadLibs articles where you picked words and phrases to make up a story? Visit here to reduce time and effort imaging new conspiracy theories about that evil Mr. Bush! They will make about as much sense.
The New Middle Passage
It is from New York Times Magazine, and it is about the international sex slave business--and the sheer scale of it in the United States.It turned out that 1212 1/2 West Front Street was one of what law-enforcement officials say are dozens of active stash houses and apartments in the New York metropolitan area -- mirroring hundreds more in other major cities like Los Angeles, Atlanta and Chicago -- where under-age girls and young women from dozens of countries are trafficked and held captive. Most of them -- whether they started out in Eastern Europe or Latin America -- are taken to the United States through Mexico. Some of them have been baited by promises of legitimate jobs and a better life in America; many have been abducted; others have been bought from or abandoned by their impoverished families.
It is hard to tell how accurate the figures in this article are:
Because of the porousness of the U.S.-Mexico border and the criminal networks that traverse it, the towns and cities along that border have become the main staging area in an illicit and barbaric industry, whose ''products'' are women and girls. On both sides of the border, they are rented out for sex for as little as 15 minutes at a time, dozens of times a day. Sometimes they are sold outright to other traffickers and sex rings, victims and experts say. These sex slaves earn no money, there is nothing voluntary about what they do and if they try to escape they are often beaten and sometimes killed.
Last September, in a speech before the United Nations General Assembly, President Bush named sex trafficking as ''a special evil,'' a multibillion-dollar ''underground of brutality and lonely fear,'' a global scourge alongside the AIDS epidemic. Influenced by a coalition of religious organizations, the Bush administration has pushed international action on the global sex trade. The president declared at the U.N. that ''those who create these victims and profit from their suffering must be severely punished'' and that ''those who patronize this industry debase themselves and deepen the misery of others. And governments that tolerate this trade are tolerating a form of slavery.''The thrust of the president's U.N. speech and the scope of the laws passed here to address the sex-trafficking epidemic might suggest that this is a global problem but not particularly an American one. In reality, little has been done to document sex trafficking in this country. In dozens of interviews I conducted with former sex slaves, madams, government and law-enforcement officials and anti-sex-trade activists for more than four months in Eastern Europe, Mexico and the United States, the details and breadth of this sordid trade in the U.S. came to light.
Pretty obviously, there is no way to get an accurate measure of a trade that is unlawful, and involves trafficking in people who are in terror of being murdered, often drugged, and where the criminals are among the most ferocious of organized criminals. I don't think you can read it without becoming indignant. It is the modern equivalent, perhaps even in the annual number of victims, of the Middle Passage.
In fact, the United States has become a major importer of sex slaves. Last year, the C.I.A. estimated that between 18,000 and 20,000 people are trafficked annually into the United States. The government has not studied how many of these are victims of sex traffickers, but Kevin Bales, president of Free the Slaves, America's largest anti-slavery organization, says that the number is at least 10,000 a year. John Miller, the State Department's director of the Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, conceded: ''That figure could be low. What we know is that the number is huge.'' Bales estimates that there are 30,000 to 50,000 sex slaves in captivity in the United States at any given time. Laura Lederer, a senior State Department adviser on trafficking, told me, ''We're not finding victims in the United States because we're not looking for them.''
The article emphasizes that these are not prostitutes, at least in any voluntary sense. They are children (including toddlers), young teenagers, and young adults, threatened, drugged, locked inside apartments to prevent them from escaping. The article suggests that they are overwhelmingly females, but does acknowledge that boys are trafficked as well.
At this point, some of you are going to say: "Ah, but if it were not for the laws against prostitution, this wouldn't be a problem." No. Quite a number of these sex slaves are too young for legal prostitution (except, of course, if the ACLU had its way):Her cell of sex traffickers offered three age ranges of sex partners -- toddler to age 4, 5 to 12 and teens -- as well as what she called a ''damage group.'' ''In the damage group they can hit you or do anything they wanted,'' she explained. ''Though sex always hurts when you are little, so it's always violent, everything was much more painful once you were placed in the damage group.
As the article points out, the increasingly depraved pornography that the Internet makes available seems to be encouraging increasingly depraved behavior:
''They'd get you hungry then to train you'' to have oral sex, she said. ''They'd put honey on a man. For the littlest kids, you had to learn not to gag. And they would push things in you so you would open up better. We learned responses. Like if they wanted us to be sultry or sexy or scared. Most of them wanted you scared. When I got older I'd teach the younger kids how to float away so things didn't hurt.'' If anything, the women I talked to said that the sex in the U.S. is even rougher than what the girls face on Calle Santo Tomas. Rosario, a woman I met in Mexico City, who had been trafficked to New York and held captive for a number of years, said: ''In America we had 'special jobs.' Oral sex, anal sex, often with many men. Sex is now more adventurous, harder.'' She said that she believed younger foreign girls were in demand in the U.S. because of an increased appetite for more aggressive, dangerous sex.
I'm not sure that the auction is believable; this sounds more like a website catering to sick fantasies more than offering real product.
...
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at the Cyber Crimes Center in Fairfax, Va., are finding that when it comes to sex, what was once considered abnormal is now the norm. They are tracking a clear spike in the demand for harder-core pornography on the Internet. ''We've become desensitized by the soft stuff; now we need a harder and harder hit,'' says I.C.E. Special Agent Perry Woo. Cybernetworks like KaZaA and Morpheus / through which you can download and trade images and videos -- have become the Mexican border of virtual sexual exploitation. I had heard of one Web site that supposedly offered sex slaves for purchase to individuals. The I.C.E. agents hadn't heard of it. Special Agent Don Daufenbach, I.C.E.'s manager for undercover operations, brought it up on a screen. A hush came over the room as the agents leaned forward, clearly disturbed. ''That sure looks like the real thing,'' Daufenbach said. There were streams of Web pages of thumbnail images of young women of every ethnicity in obvious distress, bound, gagged, contorted. The agents in the room pointed out probable injuries from torture. Cyberauctions for some of the women were in progress; one had exceeded $300,000. ''With new Internet technology,'' Woo said, ''pornography is becoming more pervasive. With Web cams we're seeing more live molestation of children.'' One of I.C.E.'s recent successes, Operation Hamlet, broke up a ring of adults who traded images and videos of themselves forcing sex on their own young children.
You may be saying, "Ah, but if it were not for our immigration laws, this would not be such a problem." No, I'm afraid not. Unlike the illegal immigrant working in a factory who is afraid of la migra deporting him for reporting labor code violations, these sex slaves worry about being murdered. Unlike the illegal factory worker, the sex slaves aren't free to leave their places of "employment," and many aren't sure that it would be safe to tell the police, even if they could. Much of the sex slave trade in Mexico is protected by corrupt officials, as the article makes very clear.
If anything, this article leads me to think that the sheer volume of illegal immigration makes it too easy for sex slaves to be imported to the United States. With millions of illegal immigrants crossing the border annually, the chances of stopping those immigrants who are being forced across the border is very small. Our only realistic hope of stopping this horrifying business is to put a real stop to illegal immigration, no matter how much grief it might cause American businesses (who rely on cheap labor) and political parties (who rely on the understandable sympathies of many Hispanic-Americans).
Authentication Needed: But Does Anyone Find This Unbelievable?
From the Washington Times, under the headline "Iraqi govt. papers: Saddam bribed Chirac":BAGHDAD, Iraq, Jan. 28 (UPI) -- Documents from Saddam Hussein's oil ministry reveal he used oil to bribe top French officials into opposing the imminent U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.
Our government, of course, is a bit more discreet about these things:
The oil ministry papers, described by the independent Baghdad newspaper al-Mada, are apparently authentic and will become the basis of an official investigation by the new Iraqi Governing Council, the Independent reported Wednesday.A senior Bush administration official said Washington was aware of the reports but refused further comment.
Short-Term Bond Yields Rising
I am seeing some surprisingly good yields (okay, it's all relative) in short-term corporate bonds. I grabbed some Daimler-Chrysler bonds yesterday due 4/15/04 with an annualized yield of 1.75%. There are GM bonds with maturites between 03/15/2004 and 07/15/2004 with annualized YTMs of 1.65% to 1.90%--a giant leap up from money market funds at the moment. If you are sitting on big chunks of cash in your money market fund right now, unsure whether to buy stocks or not, but disheartened with the 0.5% return that you are getting, these short-term bonds are not a bad choice if you are a little concerned (as I am), that stocks may be, if not overpriced, at least more likely to drop 10% than to rise 10%.
UPDATE: And don't I feel smart saying that, considering what happened half an hour later to the stock market. Or maybe it is just my many readers all panicked, and put in SELL orders. :-)
Wisconsin Concealed Weapon Law Override Vote on Hold in State Assembly
From WBAY: Assembly leaders say they won't vote Tuesday on overriding the governor's veto of a law allowing concealed weapons. Republican leaders originally put the override vote on the calendar but Assembly Speaker John Gard says he wants to make changes to the legislation to see if it can get more support.
Okay, Wisconsinites, it's time to call your Assemblycritters. Melt their phones!
They'll need a two-thirds vote in both houses of the Legislature to override the veto. The Senate voted to override last week, and it would take 66 votes in the Assembly to make the bill become law.
Offshoring
In case you missed this link from Drudge Report, the Financial Times reported two seemingly contradictory actions:
1. "India's technology industry has attacked proposed new US legislation that bans the outsourcing of federal work to low cost countries arguing it is a protectionist measure contrary to the spirit of free trade."
2. "The move by the US Senate coincides with decisions by a number of foreign companies to halt further outsourcing to India because of a new domestic tax ruling that would enable the Indian government to tax part of their worldwide earnings."
American high-tech workers should be pleased by #2. I know that I am certainly pleased. I am not even upset about #1. Yes, as a taxpayer, I certainly would like the federal government not to pay too much. But I am also pleased that the American government is keeping the work "in the family," so the speak. I also wonder if there might be some security arguments for not outsourcing federal IT work to a foreign country. I presume that nothing terribly secret was being sent overseas anyway--but there are sometimes some astonishing relationships between apparently disparate pieces of information and systems.
Budget Deficits
The last I looked, a couple of months ago, Congressional Budget Office was projecting a $12 billion surplus (including the unbelievably named "off-budget" part of the budget) in 2012. Now, CBO projecting a $13 billion surplus in 2014.
I know that they are required to make projections that are conservative; a few more quarters like 2003Q3, and we could get back to surplus a bit quicker. Unfortunately, Bush is having to pull a Clinton to win the election--triangulation--pandering to the middle of the road voters with spending programs, and pandering to the middle class with more tax cuts (although the set that took effect in 2003 seems to have caused the spectacular 2003Q3 growth in GDP).
The bad thing about democracy is that you have to appeal to the basest instincts of people to get elected--and if you don't, someone prepared to appeal even more basely (the Democrats) will beat you.
A small consolation prize: as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product, the deficits drop from 4.2% of GDP in FY 2004 to 2.0% of GDP in FY 2007, and drop quickly thereafter. This doesn't sound like enough to be a drag on the overall economy.
I Couldn't Make This Up
If I wrote fiction this absurd, no one would believe it: NASHVILLE, Tenn. — The school honor roll, a time-honored system for rewarding "A" students, has become an apparent source of embarrassment for some underachievers.
Imagine: a whole society built around the notion that equality of outcome is the highest ideal.
As a result, all Nashville schools have stopped posting honor rolls, and some are considering a ban on hanging good work in the hallways — at the advice of school lawyers.
After a few parents complained their children might be ridiculed for not making the list, school-system lawyers warned that state privacy laws forbid releasing academic information, good or bad, without permission.
Some schools since have put a stop to academic pep rallies. Others think they may have to cancel spelling bees. And schools across the state may follow Nashville's lead.
Offshoring Runs Into a Snag
From the Financial Times: India's technology industry has attacked proposed new US legislation that bans the outsourcing of federal work to low cost countries arguing it is a protectionist measure contrary to the spirit of free trade.
The move by the US Senate coincides with decisions by a number of foreign companies to halt further outsourcing to India because of a new domestic tax ruling that would enable the Indian government to tax part of their worldwide earnings.
An Interesting Observation on Gay Marriage from Down Under
Mark Richardson made an interesting observation about the effects that gay marriage may have on our society over here. He quotes from an article in the Melbourne Herald Sun about a "commitment ceremony" for two gay men:“It was just like any other wedding, involving a touching declaration of love and the exchange of rings. (Oh, except the groom was wearing red Speedo bathers for the ring-exchanging ceremony which was held in a pool lined by guests waving sparklers.)”
Okay, I assume that most gay men aren't planning "fabulous" weddings (I wish there was some way to get the right tone on "fabulous" so just imagine it), and I would expect lesbians, who tend to be a bit less... flamboyant aren't going to be anywhere near this silly.
I don’t know if you have speedos in America, but they’re a kind of diminutive, tight fitting swimming costume which most of my female acquaintances criticize for leaving too little to the imagination.
Those who believe that homosexual marriage won’t influence our understanding of the institution might like to reconsider.
I also admit, having come from California, even heterosexuals wedding ceremonies have been known to be a little on the non-traditional side (nude weddings, on roller coasters, skydiving, underwater). Of course, there's always Britney Spears as an example of heterosexuals destroying the sanctity of marriage. The core problem, unfortunately, is that the dominant values of homosexual male culture have already influenced our culture in quite powerful ways. Tongue piercing (in order to improve one's ability to perform fellatio)--came out of male homosexual culture. It is now ubiquitious in straight society in California, and not unknown in the United States. (A friend of ours in California learned far, far more than she wanted to while getting her hair done--as the two young ladies doing her hair discussed the "technical" advantages of tongue rings in making one self of interest to men, the problems of getting to work while awaiting trial on DUI charges, and all the rest of what makes California the place it is.)
Can anyone imagine the Britney Spears/Madonna interaction on TV happening if homosexuals had not been so effective at promoting their "anything goes" philosophy for the last ten years? Can anyone imagine the ACLU arguing that statutory rape laws are unconstitutional if the minor and the adult were different sexes?
I'm afraid that the homosexuals have won. Even National Review, in their desire to be accepted by homosexuals, is afraid to publish articles that point out that the Lawrence decision is based on falsification of American legal history. The battle is largely over.
Performing Very Late Abortions
One of the arguments often advanced for abortion is that fetuses or embryoes with very severe defects should be "terminated" before they are born, saving a lot of pain, suffering, and grief for not only this "tissue" but also for the parents. Many of the roughly 1/3 of pregnancies that spontaneously abort are believed to be defects so severe that the child will not be viable anyway.
Pro-lifers take the position that this is playing God--deciding which lives are worth saving, and which are not. Certainly, some of these defective fetuses will be born, and die within a few weeks or months of birth--but this is not for us to decide, the pro-lifer says. After all, doctors sometimes gets surprised. The science of figuring out which fetus is defective, and which is not, is not error-free. I recall some years ago a woman filed a "wrongful life" suit because an amniocentisis had missed that her child was going to be born with Tay-Sachs--and thus, the mother did not abort. (Tay-Sachs is always fatal by age 5.)
There are many people who agree with the pro-choice position--but they do draw the line when a child becomes viable. Generally, by five or six months, there is at least a chance that a fetus could survive outside the womb--and fortunately, this is also the point at which Roe v. Wade (1973) allows the states to prohibit elective abortions (although few do so). When I was living in Los Angeles in the early 1980s, one of the local murder cases involved a third trimester abortion in which the fetus was delivered alive. The doctors didn't know what to do, so they put it in a closet until the baby died. (I'm told that this is not unknown in late abortions, even though it is clearly unlawful.)
The strict pro-lifers insist that life begins at conception, and therefore, it doesn't matter when you abort during the pregnancy, you have still taken a human life. The strict pro-choicers insist that anytime before birth is okay--acknowledging that there is a clear dividing line at birth. (As long as the head is still inside the birth canal, however, feel free to punch a hole in the skull with scissors, and suck the brains out--rather like the gruesome sequence in the dreadful movie of Starship Troopers.)
Until now. The Scotsman has an interesting article about a pro-choicer who supports aborting post-birth fetuses (to use the euphemism that I am sure will be used): A GOVERNMENT adviser on genetics has sparked fury by suggesting it might be acceptable to destroy children with 'defects' soon after they are born.
Gee, Professor Harris, how much after birth is okay? Five minutes? Five hours? Five years?
John Harris, a member of the Human Genetics Commission, told a meeting at Westminster he did not see any distinction between aborting a fully grown unborn baby at 40 weeks and killing a child after it had been born.
Harris, who is a professor of bioethics at Manchester University, would not be drawn on which defects or problems might be used as grounds for ending a baby's life, or how old a child might be while it could still be destroyed.
Harris was reported to have said that he did not believe that killing a child was always inexcusable.
In addition, it was claimed that he did not believe that there was any 'moral change' that occurred between when the baby was in the womb and when it had been brought into the world.
He did not say how old a child might be while it could still be destroyed.
Harris, who also gives advice to doctors as a member of the ethics committee of the British Medical Association (BMA), is understood to have argued that there was no moral distinction between aborting a foetus found by tests to have defects and disposing of a child where the parents discovered the problems at birth.
How serious of a defect is sufficient? The article goes on to report that Professor Harris "recently expressed support for the sex selection of babies for social reasons." Odd. I didn't realize that being the wrong sex was a defect.
There are those who claim that homosexuality is a genetic trait. I don't really believe this, but if a baby being the wrong sex is an adequate reason to abort them--perhaps even "post-birth"--I certainly don't see why aborting pre-homosexuals, post-birth, wouldn't be a legitimate action as well.
My stomach turns when I see intelligent, well-educated people in positions of influence making arguments that suggest that they are graduates of the Dr. Joseph Mengele school of medical ethics.
Fraud & History
Ralph Luker's blog points to a very useful column by outgoing American Historical Association president James M. McPherson about the problem of fraud, fiction, and histroy. A few memorable quotes: I recently gave a tour of the Gettysburg battlefield to a group of small-company CEOs and their spouses.... As we tramped the field, one of the CEOs started a conversation about the line between historical fiction and nonfiction. What was the difference, he asked, between a novelist who invents plausible dialogue or actions and the historian who builds his narrative on fragmentary and often ambiguous evidence? I defended the integrity of our profession and the care that most historians take in sifting and authenticating evidence. But I had to concede that some of my poststructural colleagues believe that historians construct rather than reconstruct the past. I also admitted that the line between historical fact and fiction is sometimes thin and permeable.
After mentioned the Bellesiles scandal (although not by name), McPherson goes on to point out that there is a new book out based on non-existent documents: The latest entry in the field is Dark Union: The Secret Web of Profiteers, Politicians, and Booth Conspirators That Led to Lincoln’s Death, by Leonard F. Guttridge and Ray A. Neff (John Wiley & Sons, 2003). The subtitle summarizes the thesis, which incorporates and augments all of the apocryphal interpretations of previous sensational exposés except the Jesuit-conspiracy theory. Among the new revelations, Dark Union claims that Booth not only escaped but also made his way to India where he changed his name to John B. Wilkes and accumulated a fortune by the time he died there in 1883.
McPherson goes on to give several examples of documents that Dark Union cites which do not exist, apparently never existed, and where the authors have changed their explanations when scholars started asking questions.
Dark Union, written mainly by Guttridge, an author of books on naval history and the history of exploration, was based on an archive of copies of documents and manuscripts accumulated over several decades by Neff, a retired chemist. In their introduction, the authors maintain that the orthodox interpretation of Lincoln’s assassination “is substantially rooted in pure myth and faked or incomplete testimony” (p. 3). These words ironically describe their own book, as Edward Steers Jr. (author of a solid study of the assassination, Blood on the Moon, published in 2001 by the University Press of Kentucky) and Joan L. Chaconas demonstrate in a devastating review essay published in the current issue of North & South, the best of the popular Civil War history magazines. The “evidence” for Dark Union’s breathless revelations of conspiracies consists mostly “of transcribed documents, allegedly copies of originals that have been lost or destroyed. However, there is no credible evidence that any of the original documents ever existed,” write Steers and Chaconas.
Is this why I can't get this book published? Do I need to start making up more sources?
H1B Visas and High-Tech
The January 23, 2004 Investors Business Daily carried a story by Donna Howell titled "Foreign Tech Workers Finding Jobs Stateside in Healthier Economy." (I couldn't find a URL for this; somehow I ended up getting a trial subscription to the dead trees version of IBD.) The article is pretty balanced; it points out that the government substantially reduced the number of H1B visas allowed after 9/11, both because of security issues and serious unemployment problems in high-tech fields. There is now a rising demand for H1B technical workers, and corporations are saying that they are having trouble finding Americans who are available, especially in some specialties. I am of rather mixed feelings on both the extent of the problem, and the proper solution.
Is There a Problem?
I know that there are out of work software and hardware engineers--I know a lot of them. But I also know that for many of them, the problem isn't necessarily that there are no jobs, but that there are no jobs where they currently live--and the excuses that some give for why they can't move to where the jobs do not make me very sympathetic.
One person told me that he could not move to Boise because he was married to a Japanese woman, and Boiseans would not accept a mixed-race couple. That's nonsense. Boise is every bit as tolerant as California on matters of race--and quite a bit more accepting of groups that are outside the pale in Sonoma County (e.g. Christians).
Another person told me that he could not consider moving to Boise because it was a small, hick town--better to be unemployed in California. No, Boise really is not a hick town. There are about 200,000 people in Boise and its immediate suburbs, and it is so cosmopolitan that it has a gay pride parade, and the city council just voted to remove the Ten Commandments from a city park.
I've heard complaints about how terrible weather is outside of California. Believe me, I understand and sympathize (although today we have blue sky and sun). But even California weather isn't so wonderful if you are reduced to living in a refrigerator box.
There is another problem, however: employers who are not prepared to train. A lot of startups, a few years ago, had the attitude that if you were not going to be productive your first week, then they could not justify hiring you. This absurdity was driven by the insane competitive pressures of startups. The executives who ran them were convinced that even a month's delay on delivery of product would mean a billion dollar less valuation at IPO. Greed took control, and sanity left the building.
One startup for whom I worked had some very specific experience that they wanted in the DSL domain. I remember sitting in one interview post-mortem where everyone complained about how long it would take for this particular candidate, who lacked this specific experience, to come up to speed--many months, doubtless, to learn all the details. I reminded the rest of the meeting that we had interviewed another candidate who had the same problem, ten months earlier, and that we did not make him an offer for that same reason. "Do you suppose that if we had hired him, he would be productive by now? Instead, we are still looking for the perfect candidate."
I am not proposing that employers need to hire someone who has no relevant experience, and spend years training that engineer to do the job. I can tell you, from my experience getting an H1B visa approved for an employee in the 1980s, and from what I read today about the process, that an employer will spend at least several months getting an H1B visa for a foreign worker, and burn thousands of dollars in legal fees. Consider how much training, both formal and on-the-job, that this time and money would buy. Perhaps the focus on hiring abroad is less of an advantage than these employers think.
The Solution
I'm not sure that restricting H1B visas is necessarily the wonderful solution that some think. If the effect of keeping foreign technical workers from coming to work here means that employers send the jobs offshore--where those same workers get hired in India, at an Indian wage--we may just wipe out jobs in the U.S. From what I have seen, however, the notion that offshoring technical jobs is a big cost savings is a chimera. I know that Dell has brought customer service back from India in some market segments because of language and attitude problems with their Indian operation. I can tell you that my experiences with Indian customer support on some HP products has been mixed: in some cases, it worked very well; in other cases, there has been a serious communication problem.
Also, contrary to the popular image of India as a place of high English competence, I've seen plenty of evidence that some of these offshore engineering operations are, on average, pretty weak in producing documents of any sort. This is not a surprise. Contrary to popular belief, English is not a native tongue for the vast majority of Indians. They learn English in school, and some learn it very well. For many Indian engineers with whom I have had contact (and let me emphasize, Indians in India, not those who have lived in the U.S. for many years), the English they write does not compare well with the average American high school graduate. (This is not a very high standard.) I worked for a German company, and I'm sure that much of the German that I wrote in email provoked either mirth or confusion.
The anti-globalization forces call globalization "a race to the bottom." They mean that the lowest wage rates will dominate the entire world. A fairer description is that wage rates will tend to equalize; wages in India will go up, while those in the United States will go down. If the anti-globalization forces were genuinely concerned with the welfare of the poor everywhere in the world, they would welcome globalization.
Globalization has the potential to drive down the very high wages that Americans make, and this is not a pleasant prospect, especially for those who are just entering the high tech workforce. It is worrisome to those of us who are well past the halfway point in our careers, because it means that we are at much greater risk of having to retire early--and with a lot less time for our 401k plans to grow than we had originally hoped.
I do not have an easy solution to this one--but I do want employers to think long and hard about whether H1B visas or offshoring engineering jobs is quite the advantage that they assume. Corporations are notoriously faddish; tell them that they are going to save a pile of money with some new scheme, and they pile on, like lemmings to the water, trying to maximize their profits.
Juvenile Curfew Case From Indiana
The Indiana branch of the ACLU is at it again, and found some fellow ideologues on the U.S. 7th Circuit to go along with them. Professor Eric Rasmussen's comments are here. The case is Hodgkins v. Peterson (7th Cir. 2004).
If you believe that the Constitution's meaning should be understood based on original intent (as demonstrated by what laws were in effect when a particular provision took effect), then this decision makes absolutely no sense. As the decision acknowledges, juvenile curfew laws have been present from the beginning.
I wish that I could clearly identify the theory under which this decision was decided--it weaves back and forth like a drunken driver. It appears that the core issue is this: can a law treat a juvenile differently than an adult? They seem to be taking the position that if any sort of rights might be violated, that the same standards apply: is there an "important government interest" that would justify it? Even then, it appears that they believe that the same standard would apply as to an adult.
What happens if we take this claim that a juvenile enjoys all the rights of adults, and that any violation of those rights must be justified by the same standards? There are so many areas of the law where juveniles are treated differently from adults.
Parents are allowed to restrict the motion of their children (within reason). If I tell my out of control 15 year old, "it's time to come home now," I can count on the police to enforce that. (I speak from experience.) Being a parent is hard enough already; I think it would become impossible under this theory.
Our laws regulate possession and purchase of firearms by juveniles quite differently, and much more rigorously (in most states) than by adults. I can come up with some arguments for why this is a good idea, but the reasoning of this decision about learning to exercise one's rights before turning 18 discussed on pp. 10-11 of the decision would almost certainly knock this one down.
We have laws that regulate sexual activity of juveniles, varying a bit from state to state. These laws exist for a variety of reasons, including protecting juveniles from exploitation, ignorance, and emotional immaturity. Of course, the ACLU has lately been arguing that teenagers have a right of sexual autonomy and that laws that prohibit adults from having sex with minors are unconstitutional. This case in Kansas involves both a challenge to the statute because it punishes homosexual molestation more severely than heterosexual, but also argues that teenagers have a "liberty interest in being free from state compulsion" in making personal decisions about sex. The ACLU is clearly taking the position that if an adult can manipulate a 14 year old into sex, that there is nothing that the state can do about it.
This decision about curfew leads the same way. (Of course, this is necessary to satisfy the lusts of one of the ACLU's most important constitutencies.)
